Replies

It was a breast. 51% of the people on this planet have two; who really cares if someone chose to expose one of theirs in public? The people who are most up-in-arms about this whole incident are the same ones who oppose breast feeding in public.

Oh please....wake up. Baring breasts as entertainment --breast feeding in public----apples and oranges.

It's not "just one breast." It's the theory of the camel with it's nose in the tent.......it's just the beginning.....part and parcel of the continuing Follywood crusade to thumb its nose at traditional values and to eradicate all semblance of values.

Once one breast is bared, the door is open to further depravities.

Think Roman circuses that engaged in more and more decadence in order to please the rampaging crowds.

Obsessed, success-driven entertainer-types are so depraved, they would do anything to boost their careers.

If Jackass and Dumberlake thought fornicating a dog at half time would sell records, they'd do it in a nanosecond.

Once one breast is bared, the door is open to further depravities.

Like omy**d two breasts be bared! IMO that doesn't matter, I think there should be more topless beach's, that or all other beach's should require men to wear a top. If all women were allowed to go topless, men would eventually see that to be just as sexy as women find half naked men. Which is to say pleasing but no big deal. However coming close to performing a sex act on stage is a very big deal.

Good reply-- Most women I know who would breast feed in
a public place don't do it for entertainment.Heard a talk
jock put it thus -- This proves that the Jacksons ' have
a lot of money, and a lot of friends in Hollywood-but
it doesn't change the fact they are still trash.Jackson and
Timberlake intended to do what they did,and in the MTV crowd
such behavior is encouraged -I feel empathy for those parents who were misguided enough to take their children to
the Superbowl who could NOT change the channel.