To: Kahonek
"Are you saying the transgender was a woman who was genetically a man?" Yup.
And you know this because you read it in the newspaper? Any links to articles?
...Second, I doubt you would see it as insignificant if it were your daughter's/son's life impacted -- that your daughter found out that she couldn't marry the man she loved because she turned out to be a man, herself. It happens...
Those are two different cases: a woman - genetically a man - wants to marry a man vs. a woman - genetically a man - who wants to marry another woman.
According to your example, the latter would be legal, not the former.
Will Kerry attend REp Barney Franks wedding in May?
475 posted on
02/04/2004 4:26:50 PM PST by
KQQL
(@)
To: tuesday afternoon
"And you know this because you read it in the newspaper?"
I did.
"Any links to articles?"
Not right offhand. You can probably find a similar news story pretty easily with a search, though. It's what happens when you restrict yourself to a genetic definition.
"According to your example, the latter would be legal, not the former."
I'm sorry that I wasn't very clear. There are certainly XY people out there who lack male genitalia and believe themselves to be female -- until they have testing for some reason. I was hypothesizing that your "daughter" turned out to be one of those after falling in love with a man. You would, after all, have raised "her" in a manner consistent with "her" external genitalia. However, that marriage would be illegal in some (though not all) states.
476 posted on
02/04/2004 4:27:34 PM PST by
Kahonek
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson