[concerned about politics]

So why marry if their fetish requires multable anuses to fufill their lusts? Why not stick to civl unions? That way they can just trade child victims and no one would notice? Why treat them as normal when they're not?

[Modernman]

So why marry if their fetish requires multable anuses to fufill their lusts?

Wow. You have a strange obsession with gay anal sex.

If no homosexuals want to marry, then this whole discussion is moot. If homosexuals do want to marry, they can't do any more damage to the institution of marriage than we heterosexuals have managed to do.

[Kahonek]

"So why marry if their fetish requires multable anuses to fufill their lusts?"

Those were your words, not mine.

"Why not stick to civl unions?"

If that were the case, why bother with civil unions?

"That way they can just trade child victims and no one would notice?"

Uhhh... It doesn't take civil unions or marriage to molest children. I don't know where that even came from...

"Why treat them as normal when they're not?"

It's okay, really... You don't have to treat anyone as normal. I'm sure few people treat you that way...