Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Wow, does that mean you feel betrayed only by the Bush administration, or do you also feel betrayed by Clinton, Britain, Israel, France, Germany, Russia and the UN?

I guess if WMD was the only reason that I used as justification for the war, I might feel betrayed (which I don't BTW). But I think in all fairness I'd have to at least admit to the years of those entities believing in the same supposedly flawed intel. Personal emphasis on "supposedly".

WMD became a central issue in the war justification because that's the issue that Blair could best use for joining the coalition. The UN didn't sanction Saddam about human rights violations or mass murder, only WMD. Which is a sad commentary on our world but that's another topic.

Prairie

95 posted on 02/03/2004 10:16:11 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: prairiebreeze
I think they oversold the WMD, and undersold the "liberation." If the main reason for war had been liberation of Iraqis, I'd have opposed it outright. Now it's their best argument.
116 posted on 02/03/2004 10:39:34 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson