Replies

Er, David Kay found evidence of Saddam trying to buy nukes or nuke processing materials, some from North Korea.

So it sounds like you believe few issues were large enough to justify war at all. Okay...

For your consideration:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1066068/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1066536/posts

and especially:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1068163/posts

Prairie

124 posted on 02/03/2004 10:51:52 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)

Without looking at the links (thanks, but I have to get back to my damned job in a minute), I can say that I understand that our policy was regime change. And I understand we can say that Saddam was trying to acquire WMD. I guess you can say that's argument enough for invasion, overthrow and occupation. Maybe it is. But the two reasons most ballyhooed were 1)Stockpiles of WMD and later, after that one started looking grim, 2)Liberation of Iraqis. I am saying that reason 1 wasn't true and reason 2 is not a sufficient reason to go to war. Now the GOP position is that we made the best decisions possible with bad info. Not good.