Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Archaeologists have the most active (nutty) imaginations. They are followed closely by astronomers.

I get the impression that often when some ancient thing or place is described as having a 'ceremonial' significance, that they really mean to say "we have no idea what it's for".

27 posted on 02/03/2004 7:01:11 AM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Riley
I get the impression that often when some ancient thing or place is described as having a 'ceremonial' significance, that they really mean to say "we have no idea what it's for".

You are correct. But more than that, how about when they say "religious significance?" That also seems to explain away the "we have no idea what it's for." When "religious significance" is used, folks appear to be intimidated to disagree (or laugh).

33 posted on 02/03/2004 7:19:55 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson