Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tracer
How do you proposed to recirc air from a combustion chamber without introducing the heat to vital components in the engine and also significantly decreasing engine efficiency/performance?

Or am I missing your point?

I think the point of the story is absolutely correct.
9 posted on 02/01/2004 11:06:47 PM PST by bonesmccoy (defend America...get vaccinated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: bonesmccoy
"In 1972, a single case of small pox transferred multiple times before the diagnosis was made, infected 11 others, who in turn infected 138 more people, led to the isolation of 10,000 people and vaccination of 20,000,000 people in Yugoslavia."


http://www.uic.edu/sph/cade/bioforum/smallpox/hershow/tsld019.htm

11 posted on 02/01/2004 11:11:08 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
I remember seeing an air sanitizer when the anthrax scare started. Perhaps some kind of ulraviolet, ozone purifyer for all passenger airplane air circulators.

20 posted on 02/01/2004 11:43:12 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
Pressurized cabin air could be drawn into the combustion chambers through small vents, exposed therein to temperatures that would incinerate viruses, etc., and be bled off in the same volume into a chamber wherein it would be cooled by means of the sub-zero enviroment that exists in the atmosphere at the altitudes at which flight occurs.

We're talking about a quantity of air (equivalent to a portion of the cabin air contimuoussly being drawn from the cabin at a given time) that would be miniscule in comparison to the tremendous volumes of air taken into the aforementioned combustion chambers in a single second.

The system essentially would be closed and would be controlled by valves, one-way and otherwise; sensors; etc. The efficiency of the aircraft's engines would be virtually unaffected while the microbial content of cabin air at any given point in time would be minimal.

For even the most virulent of infections, multiplicity of infection -- i.e., the number of bugs that enter the body of a potential host during exposure to an etiologic agent-- is critical re: whether one becomes "exposed" to the extent that the pathogens in question can multiply at all or beyond the capacity of an individual's specific and non-specific immune respionses to successfully address.

Indeed, the small volume of air expelled during one or many sneezes and coughs by an individual infected with smallpox, ebola, etc. would be drawn immediately and ++without fanfare under negative pressure into vents above and below each seat and other areas of a fully-laden aircraft and subsequently submitted to incineration as described in the foregoing.

Granted, I'm only a fifty-year-old-plus. doctoral-level microbiologist, but at present have a few of my Gyro Gearloose-type engineering friends working up a small working prototype for the purposes of submitting a patent in the very near future.

Hopefully you can "read all about it" and benefit therefrom someday soon. Sleep well, and happy trails to us all...

25 posted on 02/02/2004 11:40:01 AM PST by tracer (ay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson