Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donh
Well, you are assuming that Dr. Spock knows how to best raise my child.

Bottom line is that they are my kids, they are my responsibility. That's what this controversy is about.

It isn't about what Dr. Spock or donh would approve of or not approve of.

The "hue and cry" is from normal people that have kids that are ticked off about nipples during family viewing hours. They have the right to free speech and they are voicing their opinion.

That you disagree with them about their outrage and/or their perceptional differences between a football game and an exposed nipple is absolutely irrelevant.

Don't you feel it is a little elitist on your part to presume to tell other people what they should or should say? Even after you have made your opinion know to them (which is your right to free speech) and they say, sorry I don't agree with you...isn't it arrogant to say that haven't debated you properly? Citing Dr. Spock, as if he is the only person that ever wrote a book on raising children, is supposed to be your intellectual sledge hammer to convince someone that you understand raising kids better than they do?

Come on, don. You raise your kid(s), I'll raise my kids. You don't watch football on TV, I will. Who knows? Maybe our kids will meet someday and iron out the differences.

Interesting discussion.

1,385 posted on 02/03/2004 7:25:28 PM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies ]


To: mattdono
The "hue and cry" is from normal people that have kids that are ticked off about nipples during family viewing hours. They have the right to free speech and they are voicing their opinion.

Indeed. Including their opinion that the FCC censure and punish all and sundry, at which point I get off the boat, because having a 400 lb gov't gorilla sit on you for artistic expression a very far cry from free speech.

1,401 posted on 02/04/2004 1:13:52 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies ]

To: mattdono
That you disagree with them about their outrage and/or their perceptional differences between a football game and an exposed nipple is absolutely irrelevant.

It may be irrelevant to arguments about free expression and the Constitution, but it is quite obviously relevant to this thread.

1,402 posted on 02/04/2004 1:16:11 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies ]

To: mattdono
Don't you feel it is a little elitist on your part to presume to tell other people what they should or should say?

Kindly site where I have done so.

Even after you have made your opinion know to them (which is your right to free speech) and they say, sorry I don't agree with you...isn't it arrogant to say that haven't debated you properly?

Excuse me, dinging me out of the blue, and then refusing to debate, is an example of ME being arrogant? Think again.

Citing Dr. Spock, as if he is the only person that ever wrote a book on raising children, is supposed to be your intellectual sledge hammer to convince someone that you understand raising kids better than they do?

Oh, come now. I did not cite Dr. Spock. I merely used his name rhetorically to try to drive the point home that there are some pretty questionable traditions that have grown up around cheerleading and football, at the professional level, that are uncomfortably close analogs to what JJ and Timberlake did. Why else were the powers that be able to pursuade themselves that letting JJ and Timberlake slobber on each other, breast-peep or no, in public, was a perfectly acceptable half-time show?

1,403 posted on 02/04/2004 1:26:00 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson