To: Blowtorch
But I never expected nudity like this. NEVER
Nor would I have thought as a grandparent or parent to expect this level of it on NETWORK tv, at the SUPERBOWL! Did you?
I know what you're saying, and it was sleazy.. but I didn't think it would be like this, did you? Not to this level.
It was beyond shocking. A bare breast suddenly appearing...
It was nudity.. and INDECENT EXPOSURE was *forced* upon hundreds of thousands of unsuspecting innocent children under the age of 12 (Not to mention those under 18 whose parents don't believe their kids should be seeing this kind of thing).
There were a lot of outraged parents at work today.
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
That was the intention, of course, to shock and offend.
The people who want us to believe we are "prudes" are so full of horse flatulence.
1,208 posted on
02/02/2004 3:03:43 PM PST by
SerpentDove
(Today is the first day of the rest of your life. Don't louse it up.)
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
"It was nudity.. and INDECENT EXPOSURE was *forced* upon hundreds of thousands of unsuspecting innocent children under the age of 12...."
Yes It was Indecent Exposure. IT'S A FELONY-- A CRIME Our laws say so .... There are thousands of ordinary people who are charged with this same thing on a regular basis. Isn't Michael Jackson also being charged with this same type crime????
Even if it was an accident.. It still happened she was exposed.. are there a different laws for entertainers than there are for ordinary folks??? Next time a cop stops you for speeding try telling him it was an accident that you were speeding.. See how far that gets you out of getting a ticket.
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Can you imagine all the churches holding "Super Bowl" Sundays & the horror at half-time?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson