Skip to comments.
Mars scientists wish they had dial-up speed (Some detail on the communications from Mars)
The Orange County Register ^
| Saturday, January 31, 2004
| GARY ROBBINS and TAMARA CHUANG
Posted on 01/31/2004 9:18:59 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SLO-MO: The Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity have been transmitting captivating images of the Red Planet to Earth
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: mars; rover
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Now this is an article that is very useful!
To: NormsRevenge; bonesmccoy; Phil V.; RadioAstronomer; Howlin
fyi
2
posted on
01/31/2004 9:20:11 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: All
What is the speed of the High Gain antenna that can communicate directly with earth?
3
posted on
01/31/2004 9:22:27 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
wait a sec... I thought they were able to get communications speeds of 182 kpbs.... in another article...
I guess someone messed up in the other article..
4
posted on
01/31/2004 9:23:18 PM PST
by
GeronL
(www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's nice to know that they'll have trouble uploading MP3's of Nora Jones tunes to Mars. Slim Whitman would be bad enough. Or Sarah McGlaegchlan. "I will disMEMber you. Will you disMEMber me?"
5
posted on
01/31/2004 9:28:16 PM PST
by
dr_who_2
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I interpreted it to mean 11,000 bits per second using the high gain antenna. But I'm wondering about something else . . . 11,000 bps is 1,375 bytes per second, a LOT slower than one-fifth the speed of a 56k modem.
6
posted on
01/31/2004 9:29:06 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think that is the speed of the high gain antenna.
When using the regular antenna the speed is much slower.
7
posted on
01/31/2004 9:29:18 PM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: GeronL
Hmmm . . . What are kpbs? I've heard of kilobits per second and kilobytes per second, but can't find anything about kpbs.
8
posted on
01/31/2004 9:36:34 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: LibWhacker
I interpreted it to mean 11,000 bits per second using the high gain antenna. But I'm wondering about something else . . . 11,000 bps is 1,375 bytes per second, a LOT slower than one-fifth the speed of a 56k modem.No, 56 kbps is 56,000 bits per second, or 5,600 bytes per second. (10 bits per byte due to the start & stop bits.) Also, assuming they're using a somewhat standard protocol on that level, 11,000 bps would be 1,100 bytes per second.
9
posted on
01/31/2004 9:37:51 PM PST
by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: jennyp
Oh, okay . . . I thought a 56k modem meant 56 kilobytes per second. Man, it's hard to keep this stuff straight!
10
posted on
01/31/2004 9:40:33 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: LibWhacker
KPBS is probably a public television station or something..
11
posted on
01/31/2004 9:42:48 PM PST
by
GeronL
(www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
To: GeronL
It must mean kilopixels per second. If each pixel has 64 bits of info in it (color and brightness level, say), that would be about right for a 11,000 bps high gain antenna.
12
posted on
01/31/2004 9:43:49 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bump.. I remember seeing the comm specs on one of the jpl/rover sites. I'll see if can dig it up.
13
posted on
01/31/2004 9:44:10 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
To: GeronL
LOL
14
posted on
01/31/2004 9:44:10 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: LibWhacker
Man, it's hard to keep this stuff straight! I worked around computers for years and never kept it straight!
I was not a specialist on Ack's and Nak's!
15
posted on
01/31/2004 9:44:53 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
By comparison, Norah Jones' MP3 song "Cold, Cold Heart" is 5.4 megabytes. And it lasts only 4 minutes and 40 seconds.Good thing they're only comparing. the RIAA would be after NASA otherwise.
You're right, this is useful information.
16
posted on
01/31/2004 9:45:10 PM PST
by
Professional Engineer
(Spirit/Opportunity~0.002acres of sovereign US territory~All Your Mars Are Belong To Us)
To: NormsRevenge
Good, I was looking but didn't find it!
17
posted on
01/31/2004 9:46:14 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: LibWhacker
11,000 bps is 1,375 bytes per second, a LOT slower than one-fifth the speed of a 56k modem11,000 bits per second = 1375 bytes per second = 1.375 kilobytes per second.
56K = 56,000 bits per second = 7000 bytes per second = 7 kilobytes per second.
Typical analog modems rated at 56K run max speeds of 49K to 52K by both circumstance and design. 38K to 40K is not unusual in older telco environments.
Therefore 11,000 bits per second can be more than 40% of common analog modem speeds and is slightly more than 20% of the speed of an analog modem operating at it's design capacity .
Hope this helps.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
128k is pretty good for an RF modem. THey can do that between the rover and Odessey, because they can use a high enough frequency. For transmission to Earth they need to encrypt the data, so no one knows they're really comms with the Martian equivalent of Earth's UN.
Just kidding... The to Earth data rate is limited, because they have to use a lower frequency to balance transmittion power and loss considerations. The power sourses on those ships are limited. If they had better microwave aiming, they could use lower power focused beams to an Earth satellite and relay to Earth on another frequency. That's still ~56k down depending on power available.
19
posted on
01/31/2004 10:03:19 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That's what they get for trying to download dirty pictures at the dame time!
20
posted on
01/31/2004 10:03:27 PM PST
by
Saturnalia
(My name is Matt Foley and I live in a VAN down by the RIVER.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson