Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky
The Cato Institute is full of Chicken Littles.
75 posted on 01/31/2004 8:14:24 PM PST by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: annyokie; Ol' Sparky
The argument over PresBush`s excessive spending centers mainly around the non-defense/non-HSD discretionary spending portion of his first four budgets, 2002 to 2005

From the Office of Management and Budget: Budget Outlays for Reagan (81-85), Clinton (93-97), Bush43 (01-05). Reagan had the largest increases in total discretionary spending and for good reason. Reagan had to rebuild the military and that was expensive. But in non-defense/non-HSD portion of discretionary spending, PresBush is the winner. Btw, notice the huge drop in defense spending under der schlickmeister.

Discretionary Spending
81-85: +35.1%
93-97: +14.8%
01-05: +30.9%

Defense Spending
81-85: +73.9%
93-97: -7.1%
01-05: +33.9%

Non-Defense/Non-HSD Discretionary Spending
81-85: +8.7%
93-97: +11.7%
01-05: +20.1%

89 posted on 01/31/2004 9:43:57 PM PST by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson