So you want to throw all that effort overboard now, do you? Willing to go AWOL in the turning point of this fight? Have you learned so little from Rush, whom we both appear to hold in such high regard, or will you simply let your bottom feeder’s-level perspective stand to validate your perceived need for self-importance here?
You need a politician to “owe you” something for your vote, so you’d better have a hope that he can deliver something more than just a feel-good, preaching-to-the-choir, rabble-rousing homily. I’ll admit, it’s easy to become beguiled by them.
Your third party trolls are mostly a lot of talk and fund raisers, knowing, of course, that they’ll never see real action. They become sounding boards for whiners, knowing all along that they’ll never have to personally face the fire and produce something of value to advance conservatism. But they’ll be the first to sit around and congratulate each other for their mistaken value of collective non-effort. You may not have a chance of accomplishing anything, but boy you’ll vote for the “feel-good” solution. And the Dems are just as happy for you to vote for that solution too. Oh yeah, YOU’LL teach your side a lesson, or two, and at the same time lose what little credibility or conservative credentials you thought you had to start with.
We could get into pissing matches about who’s been in the fight longer and drop our theoretical conservative drawers just to see who’s bigger, and run down the litany of “pedigrees,” but judging by what you wrote I already have a 25 year head start on you. It would be unfair to you, and it would likely just be a bore for everyone on FR to have to read, like what you posted last time.
Pick somebody other than Bush to vote for in 2004 and I'll just leave you to pick your own nose and reserve my thanks for those that can be counted on and will vote for Bush.
AFAIAC, this conversation is over.