Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamsey
Please check your medication! If you want to pick a fight then say so. I am telling you that I did not refer to Bush as evil, but you insist to make it an issue.

I did not think Bush was evil when I worked on the Bush campaign and took some leadership as an Election Volunteer Coor. with the NRA for Illinois and when I went to 2 Inaugrual Balls either. I put my time and money where my mouth was.

Some people just like to talk, some people like to take action.

Armchair warrior I am NOT.
385 posted on 02/01/2004 3:06:42 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]


To: chicagolady
"The lesser of two evils is still evil."

That is a logically accurate statement.

The question is does Bush's socialist tendencies make him evil?

Probably not in the Biblical sense.

Given the fact that so many prefer to quibble over semantics rather than debate the issues why not say:

"The lesser of two socialists is still a socialist."?

Regards

J.R.

387 posted on 02/01/2004 3:14:15 PM PST by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

To: chicagolady
You made the statement and can't either back it up or admit it was wrong.... I guess it's much easier to attack and insult people who call you on it.

Kudos for working on Bush's campaign the first time around... just don't make the assumption that you are talking to someone who hasn't put as much time or money into conservative causes as you have.
388 posted on 02/01/2004 3:18:16 PM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

To: chicagolady; sauropod; hoosiermama
Armchair warrior I am NOT.

Strategic conservative movement thinker you are not either, unfortunately.

Turning this ship of state around will take more patience than you and your lot of Constitution Party 0.0000001%-ers will give it.

Think: The Courts.

Your impatience would lose the entire prize, because you and your self-styled "purists" simply don't know the battles to fight, or what hills to die on.

You and your other malcontents are like a football lineman who refuses to block the opposing team because you don't happen to like the quarterback. So you rationalize to yourself, that you'd sooner throw the game and watch your quarterback get sacked by the other team, lose the game, and walk away from the game acting like you were the most valuable player.

As we witness conservative successes in 2005 and years to come with a stronger, better entrenched and better unified Republican Party, we'll not have any of you grousing self-styled "conservatives" to thank for any of it.

And maybe that will be just as well.

433 posted on 02/01/2004 9:12:03 PM PST by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson