Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maybe Bush is Right On
Intellectual Conservative ^ | 30 January 2004 | Raymond Green

Posted on 01/31/2004 6:27:08 PM PST by softengine

Much has been said about the Bush administration’s handling of sensitive issues to conservatives like illegal immigration and entitlement spending. The criticism is both broad and intense, coming from traditional allies and longtime foes. Though the criticism coming from opponents is severely hypocritical, it scars no less.

Conservatives are consistent in their disparagement of excessive government spending and amnesty programs for illegal immigrants. This, however, leaves no one to thoroughly explain Bush’s policy strategy because his adversaries stringently attack for the sake of power regardless of policy. Though I don’t personally condone the liberal approach of the current administration’s handling of these specific policies, I do understand the strategy involved.

As conservatives, we must force ourselves to look at the big picture. Our country faces a crippling moral dilemma; the tort system cost our economy an estimated $233 billion in 2003; we desperately need a national energy policy; we need to continue reducing the overwhelming tax burden in our country; our intelligence gathering methods must be vastly overhauled and improved; it is critical that the defense of this country continue to be improved and grow; and we must continue to fight the war on terrorism as we currently are or we will find ourselves in the same war on our soil in coming years. This is a minor explanation of what the macro picture currently looks like.

We can safely assume atheists will continue to embrace – and even encourage – the degradation of morality and religion in this country; trial attorneys will never propose tort reform; environmentalists will not support any realistic energy policy; those dependent on government subsidies will fight any tax cut; and liberal anti-military, anti-intelligence, anti-war, special interests-appeasing politicians will put our country at great risk if left in charge of such issues. These people are Democrats and for this reason alone it is critical that Republicans maintain control of Congress and the White House. Fortunately, this isn’t where supporting the Bush administration ends.

President Bush and company have trademarked setting traps for Democrats. He trapped Democrats into supporting the war by initiating the debate just before elections and trapped Democrats into making the capture of Saddam Hussein an issue. He trapped Democrats into opposing an entitlement to seniors and he, not Howard Dean, forced the Democrats further to the left. Bush has taken Democrats’ issues from them and set the stage for an election based primarily on national security – not a Democrat strong suit.

So we come to Bush’s base supporters. Needless to say, we are not happy – but we must be smart. I pose the following questions to ponder: (1) Will excessive government spending and entitlement programs ever be reformed with Democrats in office and (2) Does politics end when Bush’s term ends? The answer to both is obviously no. The end goal is to place Republicans in Congress strategically to outlast Bush. Bush has been accused by allies of repeating his father’s mistakes. I strongly caution against trying to use a slight majority in Congress to overhaul our country in one term – we’ve seen what that brings before.

Our country faces a number of critical issues we must address in coming years. The easiest to fix is (a) excessive government spending and (b) illegal immigration – if, and only if, Republicans are in office. Excessive government spending can be weaned down over time with a Republican majority in Congress (and it will in due time). Illegal immigration can be solved with technology, a slight bump in spending, and a determined Republican president. Neither, however, can be fixed unless steps are taken to regain a firm control of Congress and overall politics.

Do I agree with amnesty or excessive spending? No; quite the contrary. But I disagree with – and to a great extent, fear – the radical agenda of the left. It will, and has already begun to, destroy this country. It is critical we take control and if a bump to the National Endowment for the Arts silences a few artists, amnesty shuts a few radical Hispanic groups up, and a prescription entitlement makes a few seniors happy, so be it. These policies may not make an overwhelming difference in polls or make many people vote for Bush who wouldn’t have otherwise, but they change the image of Republicans and set the stage for a long-term Republican takeover.

Right or wrong, that is the Bush strategy. Choosing not to vote for him on these specifics simply counts as a vote for his opponents. He may be taking his voter base for granted; however, he may just be assuming we’re smart enough to figure out what is going on. Politics will outlast President Bush; he simply hopes it is politics dominated by Republicans who can eventually take on the issues we are forced to swallow at present.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; election; electionpresident; gwb2004; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 481-487 next last
To: Tamsey
Tamsey, the "Bush is not good enough for us" pic is perfect. Bravo.
81 posted on 01/31/2004 8:26:37 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Excellent tagline.
82 posted on 01/31/2004 8:26:40 PM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
No, Bush is moral, principled socialist.
83 posted on 01/31/2004 8:27:34 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
Thanks. : )
84 posted on 01/31/2004 8:27:39 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Four hours is too long for a Democrat to sit in the Oval Office, let alone four years. Vote W '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
And your conscience is to let the liberals win? or vote for a conservative who has your core conservative values--God, defense, less taxes, morality, no abortion and war on terrorism.
85 posted on 01/31/2004 8:28:00 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: texasflower; prairiebreeze
Yes it is excellent! Thank you for sharing! Found this part particularly interesting:

In fact, they demonstrate they are no more emotionally or mentally mature than those that hang out over at DU. They demonstrate impatience and a juvenile need for immediate gratification.

86 posted on 01/31/2004 8:28:57 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
If you think the answer to the moral decay in America is a Republican President, explain why the country is in such horrible moral decay and there has been just two Democrats in the White House since 1965

Because Republicans do things in the open where they can be contested and Democrats do things by executive order where no one sees it go into action clinton passed more unconstitutional laws through executive order than any other peresident in history and the democrat congress let it happen by doing nothing thats how they get passed so easily !

87 posted on 01/31/2004 8:29:59 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (I may never have the Courage to say some words but i will always have it to say what i believe !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
**That would bother me if not for the fact that there is nary a difference between Bush and his opponents.**

What??? I think there must be a point here somewhere but darned if I know what it is.
88 posted on 01/31/2004 8:30:20 PM PST by ilovew (I love my cowboy president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"Why"

B/c we are tired of supporting the Middle EAst oil, that is why.
89 posted on 01/31/2004 8:30:50 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DestroytheDemocrats
**Don't you love the thought of the liberal elite suffering mental anguish over losing to Bush?**

I do!! By the way, I love your name :)
90 posted on 01/31/2004 8:31:13 PM PST by ilovew (I love my cowboy president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ilovew
Translation: It's all Bush's fault!
91 posted on 01/31/2004 8:31:34 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
"The Lesser of 2 Evils is Evil Still."

Ah, but that is not true. Why do you think President Bush is evil?
92 posted on 01/31/2004 8:33:03 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Ah, of course. Silly me. Well, while we're blaming him, it must be his fault that my roommate had to get her tires aligned and that we had an ice storm last week and that there's a loud noise right outside my dorm window...
93 posted on 01/31/2004 8:33:34 PM PST by ilovew (I love my cowboy president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK; Happy2BMe
BUMPING FOR REFERENCE
94 posted on 01/31/2004 8:33:50 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: softengine
maybe I'm tired and low on coffee, but this article does not read coherently.
95 posted on 01/31/2004 8:34:52 PM PST by King Prout ("Islam" is to "Peace" as a Zen Koan is to a binary logical "if-then" statement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
I don't agree with your statement. I made more money last year with the tax cut than I did with Clinton. And I worked just as hard. Conservatives are conservatives b/c there is a core conservatism. Some might be more liberal than others but are still conservative. Liberals will do some conservative thing--but their basic values are liberal.

Clinton took more of my nickels than the republicans and Bush.
96 posted on 01/31/2004 8:38:21 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus; softengine
Ophiucus, this is a great post.

softengine, I really hope you take the opportunity to carefully think about this post. Alot of excellent realities have been presented here.
97 posted on 01/31/2004 8:38:21 PM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
The election of a president isn't anything at all like deciding which cupcake to eat. You don't need to eat that cupcake at all, but whether you like it or not, a president gets elected from one of the two major parties, every four years.

This utter tripe about " the lesser of two evils " is beyond the pale and contemptuous; not to mention too cute by half.

Stay home, vote for a fringe party, or do the same thing and just go pull the Dem lever...or, vote straight GOP. The first three choices WILL give you the same result.The fourth choice may not give you a president who will do everything you want, but at least you'll get some of it. The first three choices will give you NOTHING you crave, except Bush's ouster.

If you were dying of thirst and someone offers you a full bottle of water, but you don't want water, you want ice tea..........you're committing suicide by refvusikng the water.And THAT is precisely what those here, who swear they'll never vote for Bush are doing..........trying to commit suicide.

98 posted on 01/31/2004 8:38:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus; softengine
Forgive me I posted this to the wrong person, I meant it to go to Henchman.

I apologize.
99 posted on 01/31/2004 8:40:55 PM PST by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The people who got amnesty in 1986 might have voted for democrats but as they become productive and start making more money there is a higher percentage that will vote republican b/c they pick up republican/conservative views.

In Texas, the democrats were in controlled when Bush 1 help start the republican party. And now after many years, Texas is republican. REmember, foundation is very important if our core beliefs will sustain the assault by the far left.
100 posted on 01/31/2004 8:41:59 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 481-487 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson