[Mr Rogers]

Let's see..."You therefore *know* that taking action or inaction against Bush is done with the explicit intent of killing unborn babies. This is iron hard and concrete. It is uncontrovertible."...and you call ME an extremist?

Sorry - but I think a person can oppose GWB and not contribute to the death of a single child. We obviously disagree - but you have NO RIGHT to say my opposition is done with "the explicit intent of killing unborn babies".

[Owen]

>
Sorry - but I think a person can oppose GWB and not contribute to the death of a single child. We obviously disagree - but you have NO RIGHT to say my opposition is done with "the explicit intent of killing unborn babies".
>

If a negative result of your action is known a priori and you take the action nevertheless, there are few if any who would contort their thinking into a belief that negative intent was not present. You need to closely examine your thinking on this. You have spiraled yourself into a very bad place.