[rebel]

You wrote, "If you vote against Bush or stay home, you vote to kill unborn babies. Go look in the mirror the next day, if you can."

Did you think this when Reagan nominated all those "conservative" judges that now say there is a RIGHT to sodomy in the constitution and that Congress CAN make a law restricting the freedom of speech?

Did you think those "conservative" Reagan appointees would overturn Roe vs Wade?

If so what do you think now?

If you think Bush's appointees would do diffrent than Reagan's...well, I hope you are right but I fear that you are not.

And get off your self-righteous perch! You have no idea of what I and my family do for the pro-life movement...in the trenches! It is wrong not make such blanket statements about people you do not know.

[Owen]

>
If you think Bush's appointees would do diffrent than Reagan's...well, I hope you are right but I fear that you are not.

And get off your self-righteous perch! You have no idea of what I and my family do for the pro-life movement...in the trenches! It is wrong not make such blanket statements about people you do not know.
>

You cannot predict the future. You can only do the best you can and the best you can do is to support nomination of right leaning moderates. You Can't Do Better.

As for perches, when extremists stop advocating backstabbing GW Bush by staying home or voting third party, in an obvious attempt to kill more unborn babies by electing a Democrat, then I'll abandon the perch.