Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod
I'm not sure what you are questioning? Is it whether Perot's voters would have been Bush voters if Perot was out of the race? Clinton won with only 43% of the vote. Or are you questioning that the election of Clinton led to the very bad things happening that I mentioned? When the future of mankind is in the balance, it is not the time to send messages via 3rd party votes.
149 posted on 01/31/2004 11:19:15 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: HankReardon
I was trying to draw a distinction between voting 3rd party to "send a message" and voting 3rd party because one examines the parties' platforms and positions, analyzes them, and votes accordingly.

My apologies if I was not clear. 'Pod

151 posted on 01/31/2004 11:22:23 AM PST by sauropod (Better to have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: HankReardon
Vote 3rd party like I did in 1992! Here's what I got for my trouble.


156 posted on 01/31/2004 12:06:23 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson