Republicans: Don't give up on 'W' now! {Henry Lamb}

WorldNetDaily / Commentary ^ | Posted: January 31, 2004 | Henry Lamb

[Theodore R.]

Thomas, as he was openly Pro-life.

No, before he went on the Court, Justice Thomas said that he had "no opinion" on Roe v. Wade and had never "given it {abortion} much thought." He may have been bluffing. He is about the best of the nine justices in my opinion, with strong, forceful, consistent conservative decisions, but he said that he had no opinions on abortion when being considered for Senate confirmation.

[swampfox98]

Thank you for defending me and using a roundabout way to call arasina the L word and at the same time accusing HER of resorting to name calling. You're my clever hero

Oh my. I think I am going to have to hit the abuse button. I didn't write this post. Ummmmm, it all depends upon how handsome my protector is, that maybe I will kiss him.....or her.....or not...

Listen, dmzTahoe knows that swampfox98 needs no help in defending herself. And you'd do well to learn that, too.

[onyx]

What is the matter with some of these people today? At times, FR reads like the dolts on DU.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Next time just for you, I'll apply the sugar coated version.

[Owen]

>
If you think Bush's appointees would do diffrent than Reagan's...well, I hope you are right but I fear that you are not.

And get off your self-righteous perch! You have no idea of what I and my family do for the pro-life movement...in the trenches! It is wrong not make such blanket statements about people you do not know.
>

You cannot predict the future. You can only do the best you can and the best you can do is to support nomination of right leaning moderates. You Can't Do Better.

As for perches, when extremists stop advocating backstabbing GW Bush by staying home or voting third party, in an obvious attempt to kill more unborn babies by electing a Democrat, then I'll abandon the perch.

[Owen]

>

>i>"Any person who doesn't vote for Bush is giving tacit support to Kerry or Dean, etc. The person is the White House wields enormous power. Who do you want to have that power? Is there any choice???"
Supporting Bush is a slow and painful death. Supporting Kerry or Dean is a much quicker path to the bottom, where then enough people will be fed up and react as they should.

You want the quickest way to recovery? Let Shrillary win...then we will see the inevitable revolution occur swift and furious, and we will rebound with a better society.

>

Listen to this person. Reverse this and try to sell it on DU. Here's how it would go:

Hey all, I've decided the best path to our victory is for all of us to support the GOP and Bush. That way they will rise to power beyond the ability of filibuster to stop, society will collapse and turn to us for its salvation.

How far do you think that would get over there? The fact it gets further here is testimony to tolerance and free thought, but that makes it no less absurd.

I support the rightward most candidate who is viable. -- WF Buckley

[HankReardon]

When I voted for Perot in '92 I did not vote for him to "send a message", I wanted him to win. I'm wiser now that I know us Perot voters put Clinton in the White House and endangered greatly the survival of mankind's last best hope for Individual Freedom and Liberty, the USA. Bush/Cheney in 2004!

[johnwayne]

I have to say that I am very disappointed in Bush. I sent him money for his first presidential campaign ($1000). However, I have no intentions of sending him any money for this one. I will be going to the polls for the next election but I probably won't be casting a vote for a presidential candidate. I could change my mind between now and then but these are my current plans. A number of my conservative friends have similar feelings about Bush.

I find it very interesting how many liberals despise Bush. If I were liberal, I'd be absolutely delighted with the guy.

[tahiti]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1069214/posts

[Austin Willard Wright]

Obviously, Dubya and Cheney haven't been listening either since neither one of them think these issues are even worth mentioning.

[Austin Willard Wright]

No Hank you *don't* understand my argument. I never said that we should go to war only after the enemy kills Americans. We should go to war if an "imminent" threat of attack exists even if no Americans have been killed. Thus, your premise is entirely wrong. Not even Dubya is making the claim that Iraq posed an imminent threat, at least not anymore and you, most of all, should remember what Mother Ayn said: "check your premises."

What is your alternative to the imminent threat standard I propose? A blank check for the president, be he or she Hillary, Bill, or Dubya, to attack any "evil" dictator willy nilly?

[Austin Willard Wright]

A new kind of war? No, just a plane old utopian Wilsonian attempt to establish "democracy" in a hell-hole. Been there done that. Check out what is happening in Haiti and Kosovo if you don't believe me? As to Salman Pak, you better contact Dubya because not even he is mentioning it.

[Ol' Sparky]

No, there is no right to get high and endanger other people's lives. What perverted view of "freedom."

[Theodore R.]

Regarding the judges: imagine how nauseated you will be if "President Kerry's" Supreme Court nominees sail through, probably 94-6, with the active support of Chairman Hatch. That's what Hatch did in 1993 and 1994 as the ranking member on Judiciary for B. Clinton's nominations of the leftists Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. Of course, we cannot be sure that Bush would name a conservative to the Supreme Court if an opening does develop. But we can be absolutely certain that Kerry would name a clone of Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens, or Souter, all socialist peas in a liberal pod.

[Theodore R.]

I believe that I read that Hatch is term-limited as Judiciary chairman, and we will instead have Arlen Specter to guide the Kerry nominees through the committee were the popular MA leftist to become president. Not a good sign for conservatism, is it? I'm afraid we cannot count upon either PA or the whole USA. Of course, Specter is well acquainted with Mrs. Kerry, probably not his favorite former Pennsylvanian. As I recall, John Heinz, Mrs. Kerry's late husband, defeated Specter in the 1976 GOP Senate primary, and Specter never forgot the loss even though he came back four years later to win in that liberal state.

[WFTR]

Did you see this one? I thought it was very positive for the president.

[sauropod]

"I wanted him to win."

And do what, precisely? All I saw was him shaking his voodoo claw at some pie charts.

[Texasforever]

thought Rove believed that a million conservatives stayed home last time.

2 million to be exact and that is why Bush and Rove aren’t too worried about them doing it again. They have already been factored out of the equation. Tough luck for "conservatives".

[sauropod]

"As for perches, when extremists stop advocating backstabbing GW Bush by staying home or voting third party, in an obvious attempt to kill more unborn babies by electing a Democrat, then I'll abandon the perch."

Hi Mr. Kettle. I'm Mr. Pot. You're black.