Thank you for defending me and using a roundabout way to call arasina the L word and at the same time accusing HER of resorting to name calling. You're my clever hero.
Love, Swampfox98 
Posted on 01/31/2004 6:16:33 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
WorldNetDaily / Commentary
Henry Lamb
Republicans: Don't give up on 'W' now!
Posted: January 31, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
The most serious threat to President Bush's second term is not a Democrat; it is the growing mass of disenchanted Republicans who are accepting the proposition that there is little or no difference between the two major parties.
"Where are they going to go?" says a well-placed Bush operative. "You know they'll never vote for Dean or Kerry. And there's no Ross Perot on the horizon."
Where will they go? Nowhere. And that's the point. Republicans, especially the more conservative variety, are likely to stay home in droves. So far, the Republican strategists appear to be oblivious to this possibility.
Perhaps conservative Republicans expected too much too soon from a Republican administration. The Democrats had eight years to fill the agencies of government with activists from their special-interest groups. It is true that President Bush quickly dumped the most egregious of these types, whose positions are political plums. The underlings hired by the political appointees, however, are protected by civil-service regulations and cannot be fired, or even reassigned, without non-political justification.
The disappointment of conservatives goes much deeper and questions the fundamental philosophy which guides the administration. After eight years of watching the Clinton-Gore team march the United States directly into the jaws of a global socialist government, Bush supporters expected a screeching halt and a major course correction.
Conservatives cheered Bush's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol – a screeching halt and a major course correction – while socialists abroad and Democrats at home condemned the president.
When Bush defied the U.N. Security Council, and created a multi-national coalition to eliminate Saddam Hussein, conservatives split, some cheering the action, some joining the Democrats at home and socialists abroad who condemned the action.
The Patriot Act, the prescription drug program, the "guest worker" program, the so-called "free trade" programs and a half-trillion dollar deficit have left conservatives reeling, wondering why a Republican administration and Congress have produced results that look so much like what they would expect from a Democrat administration and Congress.
Consequently, many, many Republicans have thrown up their hands and have decided to either join some doomed third-party movement or simply stay home.
While this reaction may be understandable, it is not only self-defeating, it violates the first law of true believers: Never, never, never, never give up!
It is true that Republican hold the White House and a razor-thin majority in Congress. It is also true that the nation is divided, almost down the middle, between people who want to continue the Clinton-Gore path toward global socialist government and those who want to abandon that path and move the United States toward more individual freedom, free markets and voluntary cooperation among sovereign nations.
Rather than give up and stay at home, a better strategy may be for conservatives to realize that the election of President Bush in 2000, and securing a slim majority in Congress in 2002, is just the first step in a long journey. Conservatives should realize that it takes 60 senators to prevail over the Democrats' filibuster.
Rather than throw in the towel, conservatives might throw their effort into the campaigns of conservative candidates for the House and Senate, and for the state legislatures and county commissions.
Democrats alone cannot regain control. If conservatives give up, throw in the towel and fail to show up for the November battle, the Democrats will win by default. Conservatives who truly believe that freedom is better than socialism, those who want freedom for their children rather than a world socialist government, will never, never, never, never give up. They will show up in November.Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and chairman of Sovereignty International.
People are forgetting.
I certainly did. You're evidently just as stupid as I thought.
Then you haven't been paying attention. Remember Salman Pak? What about the Doug Feith memo?
"I certainly did. You're evidently just as stupid as I thought."
Hey Swampfox98, you should have seen this coming from arasina. Whenever a person on these threads is losing an intellectual arguemnent, they resort to name calling.
Keep it up, Swamper, you are showing these people's true colors... Arasina thinks like a liberal
I question this.
My old man told me he was going to vote for Perot and I asked him why. He told me he was going to "send a message." I asked him what message was that? He couldn't tell me.
I doubt you could either.
Vote FOR a candidate. Make a rational decision based on what his platform is.
ARRGGGHHHHH Can you loan me a cross? It's still daylight, but I fear my garlic powder won't work on FR much longer.
Your "old man" is a man of principles, and was willing to face the consequences rather than compromise those principles for short-term convenience.
Thank God our Founding Fathers were the same ilk.
Response: It won't. More like Rome II. We are only just starting into our Social War the opening of which will formally end the Republic.
No, it will fall squarely on the shoulders of people like you. You're wrong about Dubya nominating a moderate to the SC. He's given every indication that he will nominate a strict constructionist to the SC, based on his other nominations.
You seem to think that he is supposed to wave a magic wand to break the 'rat filibusters against the judges. It doesn't work that way.
He's offered recess appointments to every one of his conservative nominees. Pickering accepted and he's now on the bench.
If we can pull off another 2002 and get some more senate seats, even if we don't make 60, we stand a stronger chance of breaking the filibuster. At least a few 'rat senators should start fearing backlash from their constituents after two elections in a row like '02.
BTW, if people like you put a democrat in office as CiC, you'll be responsible for us losing the war as well as putting another Ruth Bader Ginsburg or two in the SC.
Thank you for defending me and using a roundabout way to call arasina the L word and at the same time accusing HER of resorting to name calling. You're my clever hero.
Love, Swampfox98
If he has principles then he has not articulated them clearly.
I have often voted third party and I can tell you exactly for what reasons.
That is a huge difference between us.
That my FRiend, was my point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.