Skip to comments.
Possible AWB Renewal Vote Soon in Senate
Sunset News <sunsetnews@awbansunset.com>
| 1/27/2004
Posted on 01/28/2004 4:39:58 AM PST by RogueIsland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
What a suprise! Carl Lenin's office doesn't give a damn. They didn't even ask where I was from. Jackasses.
At least Stabenow's office asked for that information for a response. I'll give her a little credit for that.
21
posted on
01/28/2004 7:32:48 AM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
(Take me down to the paradise city where the grass is green and the girls are pretty. Take me Home)
To: tpaine
You’re a generous man.
I always thought they used it for toilet paper.
22
posted on
01/28/2004 7:46:48 AM PST
by
MamaTexan
(Is anyone obligated to obey an unconstitutional government?)
To: RogueIsland
I just phoned my Dem Senator (thin-margin) of a very pro-gun state, and told the staffer that a courageous stand for our Second Amendment rights would give him a chance at my vote.
We single-issue voters need not only to be able to punish our own when they fail, but to reward our advereies when they do the right thing.
To: Beelzebubba
Just phoned my Republican Senator, too.
To: Shooter 2.5
What are your plans to stop it? You mean, beyond phone calls, letters, faxes, emails to congress critters?
25
posted on
01/28/2004 3:24:33 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com)
To: TheBattman
yeah..just like many said he would never sign CFR...the only thing i know of that he hasn't signed is a very large check for me.
He is heading for "nose holding to vote for him" at mach 15 1/2
To: RogueIsland
Please take just a moment to call both of your Senators, urging them to oppose S.1034 (the standalone bill that renews and slightly expands the 1994 "Assault Weapons" Ban) or any attempt to amend a ban renewal to S.659, the junk lawsuit preemption bill. Even if one or both of your Senators are known to be anti-gun, it doesn't hurt to remind them of how unpopular this issue is. Not to mention the expanded versions S-1431/HR-2038, which would pretty much ban all semi-automatic's with removable magazines. It would expand the "by name" ban list, and would "improve" the definition of "assault weapon" to ban many many more gun models.
27
posted on
01/28/2004 4:52:52 PM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: *bang_list
This has started to get some play on TheHighRoad.org, so I'm bumping it again. I think everyone needs to know how low-down dirty and underhanded the antis are, and how low they are willing to stoop.
To: RogueIsland
The "anti" what?
29
posted on
02/01/2004 1:55:32 PM PST
by
Neets
(Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
To: Neets
The "anti" what? It's shorthand for "anti-gun crowd". You'll see that shorthand reference on gun boards and on gun threads here now and then.
To: RogueIsland
Another bump!
31
posted on
02/01/2004 2:36:06 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: RogueIsland
I know how my representatives in Congress elected from Utah will vote on the assault weapons ban. They are probably weary of receiving letters from me. I will just let them do their job and vote no.
It's nice to have some elected representatives who care about the Second Amendment.
32
posted on
02/02/2004 7:33:56 PM PST
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson