Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Momaw Nadon
You'll never see it in the ultra-left wing, neocommunist media, but we have not had enough analysis of PanderAl Gore's decision to knife LIEberman in the back to support Dean. Is it just dems being demish to one another? If there is a problem with Joe was there one in 2000 and, if so, why was he selected as VP candidate and why weren't we told them?

Just imagine what the lefties would be saying if a losing Republican nominee had failed to endorse his running mate for the top slot in the next campaign. There was a lot more to Al's decision and we have a right to know what it is.

My view, of course, is that Al will try to run at the 2004 convention and wanted to take out anyone who might compete as a centrist and, if nothing else, maitain status as a party leader into the 2008 campaign.

39 posted on 01/27/2004 3:34:21 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tacis
re: THE GORE ENDORSEMENT OF DEAN--

Once Dean officially passes from view in a week or two, then the door is a little bit open for gore to start some talk about him saving the day.

I doubt that was the plan, because gore is too stupid for that,-- but it has that effect, doesn't it?
49 posted on 01/27/2004 4:07:05 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson