[JohnGalt]

your ceaseless and baseless attacks on President Bush can be taken as a defense of Hussein.

The intellectual history of this type of argument is Marxism.

[HenryLeeII]

Uhh, Marxism is a form of socialism, an economic model. You baselessly accused me of appeasing Ghaddafi with absolutely nothing to back it up with, so I pointed out the stupidity of your argument and your hypocrisy by lumping you in with the other Hussein-apologists (John Kerry, Howard Dean, MoveOn.org, Martin Sheen, the French and Russian governments, etc.) who continuously attack George Bush for things he never said AND for having the courage to defend our country (and the world in general) by taking out a reckless tyrant such as Hussein and forcing another (Ghaddafi) to the bargaining table. Perhaps you would prefer Al Gore, who would still be negotiating with the U.N. about what to do with the Taliban. Your arguments are insipid and specious, and you lack the intellectual depth to participate fully on a forum such as this.

[George W. Bush]

The intellectual history of this type of argument is Marxism.

I was under the impression that Marxism is now considered a philosophy. It's claims as a science or rational economic model are thoroughly refuted.

Increasingly, it will be viewed as a historical curiosity, much the way we see the race theories or the one-leader type of fascism (Hitler, Mussolini) as ignorant but tragic relics of the past.