[Gerasimov]

Your question indicates that you don't yet understand how evolution works.

And your statement assumes that evolution actually does work. :-)

Of course I understand that a trout does not suddenly give birth to a lion cub. Your statement indicates that you don't yet understand the basic statement I have been making; which is that there is no conclusive evidence to indicate these changes happen, even over the "billions and billions of years" (I always have to say that out loud in the Carl Sagan voice, BTW) that evolutionists like to use to pad the gaps in their "record."

People who don't agree with you aren't automatically "stupid."

[PatrickHenry]

People who don't agree with you aren't automatically "stupid."

Right. I'd appreciate it of you would follow this link, which is a question I posed to another creationist (post 208) on another thread. I would appreciate your answer to that question.

[VadeRetro]

Your statement indicates that you don't yet understand the basic statement I have been making; which is that there is no conclusive evidence to indicate these changes happen, even over the "billions and billions of years" (I always have to say that out loud in the Carl Sagan voice, BTW) that evolutionists like to use to pad the gaps in their "record."

This is just nuts. There's an enormous preponderance of evidence for common descent. 29+ Independent Lines of Evidence. Your ignorance is only proof of ... your ignorance.