[ohioWfan]

What does ONE editorial in the WSJ have to do with your sweeping attack on what 'bots' want?

IF you would understand that you could make your point with out the ad hominem attack on 'bots'......which is EVERYONE who supports the President to you.......you might be taken more seriously.

Your blanket condemnation on all of us who support the President, on the basis of ONE column negates any point you might have been trying to make.

[maica]

My response to the WSJ article this morning. I am not sure how many readers take the time to read newspaper on line reader comments, but I do not want to leave the critics of President Bush sole occupancy of any forum:-----

Getting the Bureaucracy to Move
--maica---

Thank you for discussing the reality of the immigration situation as it exists in the United States today. Too many conservatives are not facing reality; President Bush does. Obviously the status quo is not acceptable. Standards for residence in the U.S. have to be recognized by all--employers, local law enforcement officers, INS or homeland security management and officers, and elected officials across the country.

Right now there is no unity of action among all these various groups. To people who blame the employer group, I ask, why did you not blame the employers when the Democrats were in power in Washington? The INS appears to have had a policy of not cooperating with employers who had questions about documentation. Also the INS has been glacially slow in processing papers for persons trying to follow the rules of legal entry. If President Bush can change the behavior in the federal bureaucracy, it will go a long way to improving the situation for all in our country.