Who says George W. Bush has done "nothing" for conservatives?

WhiteHouse.gov; various news sources ^ | 1/27/04

[PhiKapMom]

LOL!!! Part of the I wouldn't want to play poker with Jim Baker mentality. Bet they couldn't believe Baker was coming for a "discussion!"

[RiflemanSharpe]

I disagree. Bush could and should veto bills with pork and then make congress trim them down if they do not want a veto. With the increases in defense and national security spending that has to happen due to the war we need to make deep cut whereever we can to balance th budget. It is time to get tough.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Wolfstar: Very nice! :)

Howlin: Thanks for pinging me to this! :)

[onyx]

Hey, it's like old home week -- come on in, the sharks are swimming.

[BigSkyFreeper]

[My2Cents]

So Clark/Hillary is getting 10%! I love it!

Corporal Klinger won Dixville Notch, and then it was a plummet into the abyss.

[onyx]

BARF. And you're source (URL) is...?

[Neets]

LV Editor's Note

Who or what is LV?

[onyx]

Corporal Klinger won Dixville Notch, and then it was a plummet into the abyss.

Is that right? LMAO

[onyx]

LV? -- URL? I asked the same question. Watch my back will ya? I'll be back asap.

[ChadGore]

To me, it's simple.

Bush ended the recession in the first year of his first term and, from Kabul to Baghdad, defeated 2 of our declared enemies in the course of 18 months, with a casualty rate during those 18 months of less than one hundreth of one percent of forces deployed. Properly compared, Bush took Baghdad faster than Clinton took Waco.

This attribute will not be properly bestowed upon him in his lifetime, but GWB is a fantastic military leader. The liberal appeasers and isolationists argued that the taking of Kabul or Baghdad would look like the sands of Iwo Jima, and never have so many been so wrong about so much.

Put simply, GWB has done more to earn my vote than any other American alive today, but there's a larger question for us as a nation to consider.

The long view.

Our enemies looked at punks like Kerry throwing their medals over a fence onto the white house lawn back in the late 60s and wrongly conclude that we, colectivly, as a people lack the vigilance, determination, and fortitude to maintain a long term comitment to defeating our declared enemies.

If Bush looses this term, future Presidents will know that they can't put their faith in the people of this great nation to see a mission through to fruition.

"If Bush couldn't keep the country united in fighting terrorism after an act of war like 9/11, this country simply isn't capable of it.", you'll hear them say. You'll hear appeasers opine: "Bush lost his second term because he couldn't keep the people vigilant to the cause." and on and on.

It's important to future Presidents, who will no doubt have the War On Terrorism on their agenda, to have the confidence that terrorists and their allies should be met with military force. If they are, the good people of a grateful nation will reward them at the ballot box for their vigilance, determination, and fortitude.

Bush 2004. He's Earned It.

[FirstPrinciple]

Pat Toomey is not getting any support from the White House against Arlen Specter because he is a conservative going after a RINO. RINOs (one in the White House and several in Congress) take care of each other.

[Miles Vorkosigan]

Odd, isn't it, that people who complain about mythical loss of freedom here don't give a rat's a** about the gain of freedom in Iraq--and fail to mention the gain of freedom here, too, now that we don't have an illegal gun registration system like we did under Commissar Klinton.

[Miles Vorkosigan]

Why don't you ask Toomey whom he supports for President? My guess is that it's not Howard Phillips.

[nopardons]

Go back and read your post, that threw Rush Limbaugh into the mix. That's what I'm talking about and what you are running away from. ;^)

[Neets]

AH!!! I found it on my own.

Damn that google.

LIBERTY VAULT

LIBERTARIAN POLITICAL ANALYSIS AND INTERNET RESOURCES

With live links to antiwar.com looserockwell and other amusing places to visit.

SG!!!!!!!!!!!

You kidder you!

[Sir Gawain]

BARF. And you're source (URL) is...?

Here ya go. I have it in my FR bookmarks.

http://alanchapman.org/libertyvault/gwb.html

I'm impressed with your refutation of its sourced points.

[Ignatz]

p-p-p-p-ping!

[Sir Gawain]

With live links to antiwar.com looserockwell and other amusing places to visit.

Logical fallacy. But you knew that. The links are sourced. Try again.

[nopardons]

Thanks for the backup! I know it's been the law for decades, but you and I seem to be the only ones who know about it; sadly.