To: txradioguy
"And since when does ANYTHING written in the Enquirer constitute either ethical journalism or something admissible in a court of law?"
Apparently there was enough "grit" in the Enquirer to have Rush take the charges seriously. And as far as professional jounalism goes, I'd take the Enquirer over the NY Times any day of the week.
To: ScreamingFist
"I'd take the Enquirer over the NY Times any day of the week."
Fist, speaking as someone who's worked in journalizm since 1989, you need to se your standards of what constitutes "good journalism" much higher than what you appear to have them.
103 posted on
01/27/2004 7:20:39 AM PST by
txradioguy
(This Tagline Sponsored By The U.S. Army)
To: ScreamingFist
"I'd take the Enquirer over the NY Times any day of the week."
Fist, speaking as someone who's worked in journalism since 1989, you need to se your standards of what constitutes "good journalism" much higher than what you appear to have them.
104 posted on
01/27/2004 7:20:51 AM PST by
txradioguy
(This Tagline Sponsored By The U.S. Army)
To: ScreamingFist
I found it interesting that they gave immunity to the two who were actually blackmailing Rush. That about says it all to me regarding their motives.
127 posted on
01/27/2004 8:19:23 AM PST by
mware
To: ScreamingFist
Apparently there was enough "grit" in the Enquirer to have Rush take the charges seriously. Since Rush hasn't been charged with anything what are you talking about?
161 posted on
01/27/2004 12:04:28 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson