Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh and Black get the Goods on Brischer
The Rush Limbaugh Website ^ | 1-26-04 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/26/2004 9:17:19 PM PST by Angelica411

Caller's office received a public records request in Rush Limbaugh case. File includes letters from atty in SAO to Roy Black, defense counsel. Checked with AG's office and AG says the files are public records except there are two letters which include plea negotiations which are not normally to be revealed so may or may not be public record.

...

All info in file is confidential as to his client, the state, under 4-1.6.

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: krischer; limbaugh; loveyourush; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-256 last
To: Nick Thimmesch
"ILLEGALLY buying & possessing Oxy"

And .. you have PROOF of that .. right ..??

I said PROOF not your made up theory.
241 posted on 01/28/2004 12:33:35 AM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Exactly!!
242 posted on 01/28/2004 12:56:12 AM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: jettester
How about the Trust Fund for the education of the children of those members of the military killed in action? I don't remember the name, but Hannity promoted this with an event at Great Adventure last year.
243 posted on 01/28/2004 4:37:35 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
My objection was to false and misleading statements that had nothing to do with this news item. There are no charges, and I fail to see what the hell an SUV has to do with any of this.

As for the disparate price of justice, trust me, I am quite familiar with the subject.

Off the wall comments like those I responded to, however, are a poor place to hang one's hat on that topic, and it is not the topic of the thread.

Disagree with that if you wish. I am not out to be a thread cop, nor do I reply to every inane comment I see, but that sort of cavalier stupidity does occasionally get my attention and provoke my ire.
244 posted on 01/28/2004 6:56:51 AM PST by Imal (An argument made from ignorance is not a convincing argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Read the Constitution.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

245 posted on 01/28/2004 7:15:03 AM PST by thoughtomator ("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Oooh, heaven forbid anyone should provoke your ire.
246 posted on 01/28/2004 10:58:03 AM PST by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"The House of Representatives shall ... have the sole Power of Impeachment."

"The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments"

If the House imposes the "impeachment" (it's not an indictment). Trying the "impeachment" means Clinton was CHARGED with impeachment before the Senate did anything. The "trial" is to reveal the facts of the "impeachment" .. and no democrat wanted the FACTS revealed.
247 posted on 01/28/2004 11:41:25 AM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Well, I hope your spouse is never screaming in pain at the same time she is going through withdrawls from a pain med she really needed. It was a very horrible experience. A lot of people that haven't had severe pain don't know how pain meds work. If you have X amount of pain and take a pill that covers X amount of pain you don't get high. It isn't until I have X amount of pain and you take X+ pain pills that you start getting high. That is where abuse comes in. There are many people in this country that need Oxycontin and those who abuse it are helping take it away from those who need it.
248 posted on 01/28/2004 9:55:42 PM PST by USNBandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
Now I see>
I wasn't responding to you, but to RS> I wanted to ping him concerning a new line of argument that Black may follow ( after the blackmail claim attempt)
Thats where my unimaginable agony comment fit in>. Like Black would have a hard time claiming pain when Rush was out golfing and having a high time publically through all this. Also, RS is not having any Luck tracing the actual date of Rush's surgery that supposedly started the whole pain pill addiction.
Feel good, Sarah
249 posted on 01/28/2004 10:11:03 PM PST by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
You didn't bother to research it did you? I have watched as a close friend dealt with a wife who was addicted to pain pills and chemically lobotomized by 7 or 8 psychotropic drugs with a handful of other assorted drugs thrown in just to keep things interesting. It was no less a hell for him to have a wife who couldn't write down a phone number after having it repeated six times slowly. Or finding her lying on the floor purple and not breathing. And doing this fun little routine for seven years.

You have no sympathy for Mr. Limbaugh why are you asking for sympathy? You can suck it up and take it without whining just the same as you expect him to.

250 posted on 01/29/2004 7:40:12 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Nick Thimmesch
Can't wait for Rush & his dittoheads to speak out against Florida's marijuana laws, too.

Rush isn't decrying any drug laws so why should he make an issue of pot laws. (FWIW I often argue for legalisation of Cannabis.) The problem here is not the application of the law it is the jihadi application for political reasons.

251 posted on 01/29/2004 7:52:25 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: My Dog Likes Me
I hope this thread has ended.

Nope. It goes merrily on without your leftist class war crap.

252 posted on 01/29/2004 8:03:31 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
Oooh, heaven forbid anyone should provoke your ire.

Indeed, those who do risk hearing about it. Rawr! ;^)

253 posted on 01/29/2004 11:17:04 AM PST by Imal (Liberalism: Embracing the doctrine of pre-emptive surrender for over a century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I'm not asking for sympathy. My point was that some people need these meds and people that procure them illegally make it harder for those in need. Your opinion seems to be that since some people have gotten addicted that nobody should have access to the med.

If we had the same attitude about laxatives, because some people with eating disorders abuse them, you would be in real bind.

254 posted on 01/29/2004 5:59:06 PM PST by USNBandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Your opinion seems to be that since some people have gotten addicted that nobody should have access to the med.

Not at all. My opinion is that the JBT's should get there sorry asses out of doctor's offices. They can take their unConstitutional WoSD's and shove it.

I was responding to your wholly unsympathetic opinion that someone who becomes addicted to a drug after seeking pain relief from a doctor, then makes poor decisions in regards to that addiction, is somehow responsible for your doctor's actions.

It's quite the opposite. Doctors tailor their treatment of patients in response to government harrassment by Drug Warriors. Patients who become addicted find their doctors unsympathetic and in denial about the whole situation because the doc's are paranoid about criminal charges. Doc's are so paranoid they cut back or refuse to give pain meds to those who need them.

People like you exacerbate the problem by putting the blame on those at the end of the line of causality. The patient. The patients are subject to the doctor's actions and the doctors are practicing medicine to please government bureaucrats with budgets to justify and Congresscritters are setting those budgets and passing the laws in order to get votes from you.

This is what medicine will be the more it becomes accountable to government. Every decision approved by bureaucrats.

255 posted on 01/29/2004 11:56:25 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Read the first paragraph of post 142.
256 posted on 01/30/2004 4:05:04 PM PST by USNBandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-256 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson