To: ambrose
yippppeeee!
2 posted on
01/24/2004 2:55:23 PM PST by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: fooman
I want to know how much longer the media is going to consider Wes Clark a viable candidate?
3 posted on
01/24/2004 2:56:40 PM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(Wiilliam Creels Headline is a miserable failure.)
To: fooman
200 responses does not look much of a poll if you don't aggregate the days.
To: fooman
Doesn't matter. I'll go on record now predicting a Bush win, and Republican gains in both the house and the Senate.
The public is fed to the teeth with the abuses of the democrats. Lest we forget, the 10 stooges have been out there because they no longer have control of the press and because they have no direction. They're hoping people mistake their noise for ideas, uprightness, newness and leadership. It is still just noise. It is still nothing more than a mask over a mindset that has led us to the public policy mess we've been cleaning up after 8 years of the Clintons and 40 years of Democratic control on policy in general. It's over. We aren't going back there. And the public is behind Bush. The dems can nominate whoever they will, in the end, the Clintons will still control their party, Bush will remain in the whitehouse and Rudy will be waiting in the wings with a pocket full of casket nails. Three cheers me lovelies!!!
102 posted on
01/24/2004 5:11:56 PM PST by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson