Skip to comments.
HUMAN MIGRATION TRACKED IN STANFORD COMPUTER SIMULATION
Stanford University Medical Center ^
| 21 January 2004
| Amy Adams
Posted on 01/23/2004 7:18:12 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: All
I feel rude even asking this question, but when I read the initial theorem that all humans have evolved from that life form which existed in Africa, I had no problem with the idea posited, but, I wanted to ask further:
Was the continent of Africa as it is now too? Haven't the land masses shaped and reshaped, and shrunk and enlarged to some extent? Perhaps what we now consider Africa was not at its current location in relation to other bodies of land, and perhaps it had an entirely different weather system.
Perhaps all the great land masses were at one time joined and the oceans were smaller then, as I understand it they are currently growing larger, taking land shelf areas and islands under water.
If mankind has evolved greatly, would it not be fair to think that the earth's land masses have also evolved both in size, shape, ecological factors and location geographically?
The only land mass I ever hear discussed is the Alaskan/Russian bridge over which the original Mongolian tribes travelled to become the ancestral race of the indigenous North and South American peoples.
What about all the other continental regions?
I know curiosity killed the cat.
To: imintrouble
This might be of interest to you re: the continents.
link
"According to the continental drift theory, the supercontinent Pangaea began to break up about 225-200 million years ago, eventually fragmenting into the continents as we know them today."
The link shows various diagrams of the continents splitting off.
To: Moonman62
I thought this was going to be another thread about amnesty. I was thinking more along the lines of the government tracking people via top secret transponders in cell phones. /tinfoil hat
23
posted on
01/23/2004 1:16:19 PM PST
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(Principled conservatives need not apply...we're all centrists now. Shut up & pay your taxes.)
To: imintrouble
24
posted on
01/23/2004 1:19:06 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: CobaltBlue
My own DNA will tell me whether it's true that my great-great-grandmother was half Native American LOL. It's always amazing to me when I here white folks talk about their Cherokee ancestors. It's a riot. So many people at my work claim they have Native blood that you'd think we have Ghost Dance or something. LMAO!
To: texasbluebell
I unknowingly posted the link you gave among the three that I provided. I guess that means it's a good one.
26
posted on
01/23/2004 1:27:24 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: I got the rope
Well, my great-grandmother was a student at the Carlisle Indian School in Carlisle, PA. I obtained her student record from the National Archives, and she is listed as half Chippewa. So I don't think there is any question that she was part Chippewa. What I specifically want to know is whether the Chippewa was on the maternal side or the paternal.
I think probably maternal, that's the family oral history, but I am having trouble tracing her side of the family any further back than 1880.
To: Doctor Stochastic
It would be fun to do a similar model with linguistic chances Yes! Let me know if you ever do one.
28
posted on
01/23/2004 1:33:22 PM PST
by
livius
To: PatrickHenry
I can program a computer to give you any result you want... what's the big deal?
29
posted on
01/23/2004 1:37:14 PM PST
by
Mr. K
To: Doctor Stochastic
It would be fun to do a similar model with linguistic chances ... And cultural changes too. I'm specifically thinking of the American Revolution, which certainly could be regarded as on the "migratory wave front" of European civilization. My guess would be that in any culture's "heartland," the tendency would be toward stasis. There are probably examples going both ways.
30
posted on
01/23/2004 1:39:15 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: Mr. K
I can program a computer to give you any result you want... what's the big deal? The big deal is that this article discusses a computer model which gives a result consistent with observed reality. Thus, perhaps the model has something worthwhile to tell us.
31
posted on
01/23/2004 1:42:49 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
With the possibility that your both right...
32
posted on
01/23/2004 1:44:46 PM PST
by
mpreston
To: PatrickHenry
You missed my point- I can program it to give a desired result especially if I have a known result.
Trust me on this- no computer program is anything more than what the programmers put into it.
33
posted on
01/23/2004 1:45:18 PM PST
by
Mr. K
To: PatrickHenry
Probably next they'll want to use real data and pop on over to the Global Climate Lab to use their earth model.
34
posted on
01/23/2004 1:50:02 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Mr. K
I can program it to give a desired result especially if I have a known result. Maybe, if you fudged the starting point, or the rate of mutation, or the rate of migration. But to make a model consistent with all known factors, and end up with something consistent with the diversity we now see, tells us that you can get from there to here in a manner that makes biological sense. That's not just a worthless model.
35
posted on
01/23/2004 1:54:55 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
are you a programmer?
36
posted on
01/23/2004 1:57:05 PM PST
by
Mr. K
To: I got the rope
It's always amazing to me when I here white folks talk about their Cherokee ancestors.So do black folks --- only I believe they most likely do. The Indians went somewhere --- and there aren't many pure Indians tribes left --- they went into the other populations here. One Indian ancestor 6 generations back could have hundreds of thousands of white and black and indian descendents.
37
posted on
01/23/2004 1:59:57 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: texasbluebell; PatrickHenry
Thanks to both of you. I could only recall the word "plate" and from the little I knew of the subject, I hesitatated for a while to even ask my question.
I appreciate nobody threw creme pies at me!!!
Now for some reading!
To: Mr. K
No, I'm not a programmer. As you appear to be, then let me know if you can program a model giving the same result as the one in the article, with the same mutation and migration rates, but with a starting point of only 6,000 years in the past.
39
posted on
01/23/2004 2:01:37 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: imintrouble
I appreciate nobody threw creme pies at me!!! We only throw pies when someone seems to reject all evidence and rational argument. Until then, we're pleased to provide information.
40
posted on
01/23/2004 2:05:13 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson