Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
That is true. They are selfish human animals. With the ability to think comes the ability to make a conscious decision. I am pro-abortion, proudly so. I see no reason for a woman to go through a long pregnancy and then not want a child. That is the height of irresponsibility. And I think it's just as irresponsible to give birth and have the child adopted for conveniences sake. In some circumstances, I can see it is a necessity, but under most conditions it leads to lifelong agony for the mother. Either way, an unwanted child is a burden to a woman and it certainly is a strike against the child. I regard this as a purely moral issue. I believe it is morally wrong to advocate against abortion. In fact, to use all of your language, in a way (though I don't think this way) it is sinful. A sin against the individual who is forced by law to go through with something that a medical procedure will end.
60 posted on 01/22/2004 7:00:30 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: The Westerner
"By law" meaning if you all have your way and abortion is once again made illegal in the United States.
61 posted on 01/22/2004 7:06:43 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: The Westerner
I am credulous that you, as a thinking adult would agree the the best solution is an abortion.
You are self centered and you proudly display it. A thinking woman? A thinking woman knows that it costs big bucks to have an abortion and nothing to keep her legs closed. It prevents her 100% from getting any sexually transmitted diseases. And because you cannot be in anyone's head, you are advocating a mind altering decision. Why do you think women are upset after a miscarriage? Our bodies were designed that if a pregnancy is terminated, our hormones go and we get depressed. (Office Manager/Medical Assistant, thank you).

You must be a man and will never understand. This quote, "And I think it's just as irresponsible to give birth and have the child adopted for conveniences sake" proves it. Perhaps a woman with no compassion for other humans?
Maybe some personal responsibility, i.e. birth control or abstinence, is a better solution.
70 posted on 01/23/2004 2:32:58 AM PST by netmilsmom (God sent Angels- Why would I trust them to anyone else?-homeschooling 1/5/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: The Westerner
Oh and by the way,
"Me, me, me, me, me, me,"

I'm sure you will understand this even if you don't understand the post before.
71 posted on 01/23/2004 2:38:25 AM PST by netmilsmom (God sent Angels- Why would I trust them to anyone else?-homeschooling 1/5/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: The Westerner
I am pro-abortion, proudly so. I see no reason for a woman to go through a long pregnancy and then not want a child. That is the height of irresponsibility.

No. It's the height of murder to do otherwise.

Who has brainwashed you, so that you see the convenience of a woman who has CHOSEN to become pregnant as more important than the life of a child?

101 posted on 01/24/2004 1:30:11 PM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: The Westerner; Brad's Gramma; ohioWfan; SpookBrat
I am almost speechless, and certainly grieved, at the arrogance portrayed in your post #60. Not often do I come across someone seemingly SO debased and ruthless in thinking they can 'play God' with the unborn, tossing aside the very miracle of life in such a heartless and vile way. One day you will come to recognize and admit the truth of life. I promise you that.
104 posted on 01/24/2004 8:39:25 PM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson