Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
Have you ever been pregnant?
Have you experienced the physical reality of a fertilised egg attaching itself to the wall of your uterus, or a fallopian tube?
It is very different from normal female biological monthly menstruation.
I again point out the differences of the facts of physical reality to mental,political, or spiritual conceptual theory.
113 posted on 01/22/2004 7:44:34 PM PST by sarasmom (If I get a fake blue card, does that mean I wont have to pay for health and auto insurance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: shaggy eel
Thank you for the ping to this thread, John. Rather than give a dead soul like GS a forum boost (the GSs of the world enjoy nothing more than to shock folks by displaying what the GSs believe is enlightened social dictum), allow me to address the article.

“I realize now that I was not only choosing for myself, I was choosing for my baby -- and it was his life. I was choosing for my husband. I was choosing for my other children. And I was choosing for their grandparents. The question, then, is not "Did I have a right to choose?" The real question is "Did I have a right to choose for everybody simply because I carried that baby in my body?"Kind of shoots to Hell the demonic mantra of ‘a woman’s right to choose’ the serial killer.

"This baby did not belong to me. These babies belong to the ages. He was not my possession to dispose of as I wished.”Each individual alive human, at whatever age she be found, has the unalienable right to her own life already being lived, or none have an unalienable right to their life. We’ve all read that assertion, but here’s why it is absolutely true: if someone or some court or some body of politicians can raise an arbitrary reason why the black person or the embryo has no right to their life already being lived, then all that awaits is a particular other group to assign a new arbitrary classification! Ask the slaves of 1860 or the Jews in ashes at Dachau … and ask the soulless Kate Michelman to explain it with the feminist’s arbitrary assignment. … No, not explain the abortion holocaust, have her explain why it was ‘legal and thus right’ to murder and destroy alive fellow human beings, because if that ghoul cannot explain why it was legal and right then, she sure as Hell cannot do so for the abortion slaughter she defends, at least not honestly!

“Feminists have told women that abortion is about reproductive freedom and will allow them to be empowered and fulfilled. But real power comes with love and responsibility. And there is neither love nor responsibility connected with abortion. There is no fulfillment or power in being soul-sick either.

Some day we will look back on this abortion era aghast at what we allowed to happen, as we now do with slavery and the Holocaust. The evil keeps popping up and it catches us every time, in spite of our "lest we forget" rhetoric.” If America continues to accept the lie that serial killing of unborn children is a ‘reproductive right’, this nation isn’t worth the honor of our Soldiers dying to defend it. Because if an unconstitutional activist supreme court can arbitrarily assign such a right to kill a class of fellow human beings, then the enlightenment claimed in abortion rights is nothing but a passing fad to be exploited then move on to the next dehumanization. And you know what, folks? I know what that next dehumanization is all about … exploitation and cannibalism of embryonic and then fetal human beings. If you cannot see it coming now, then you haven’t been paying attention, America.

114 posted on 01/22/2004 7:51:36 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson