Sure. He put himself in. Four minutes of footage at the beginning. (Mike had not done a comparable segment. He did not want a narrator in the video; he wanted the individuals interviewed to tell the story in their own words.)
Here's a mystery of sorts about the interviews Kelly switched. The witness recently quoted in another thread was indeed one of those originally interviewed several years ago. Mike didn't think her comments added anything, so he did not include her interview in the video. Given her pleading for Kelly's version, her claims of inside information, and her financial support for Kelly, one would instantly guess he put her back in?
He did not. The judge was puzzled by that and asked her (on the phone) why she wasn't in the video? Well, she said, she looked just horrid that day so she begged Kelly not to include her.
I think Kelly used the lady exactly the same way he used Mike and a few sympathetic folks in Canada. He told them all the same thing, that he needed money to continue... It went on for four to five years. Now it ends.
1st I've heard of this.
thanx.