Bush loses in Iowa

WND ^ | 1-21-04 | Joseph Farah

[KantianBurke]

I do if its akin to stalking and the poster is pretty nutty.

[Corin Stormhands]

The big loser was George W. Bush.

You'd like that wouldn't you Joe?

[BureaucratusMaximus]

The real question is, where are the high-profile Republicans, who should be speaking out about the President's mid term lurch towards liberaldom? Why have they been neutered? They seemed to be everywhere, before the last election.

Ah yes...hypocrisy. Yes all the high-profile Republicans and Freepers squealing the loudest against X42 have now been mysteriously transformed into the GWB cheerleading and appeasement squad...stomaching and sometimes ignoring the current admistration's march towards socialism, the NWO, and a eventual third world environment in the form of the open borders/quasi-amnesty program for mexcian lawbreakers. But he's our man, he's an (R), we have a (R) majority in the House and Senate, and that's OK.

Maybe if someone on his own team would reproach the President on the amnesty and the PATRIOT Act, it might prompt a correction or at least softening, of his stance.

Don't count on it you Bush-hater...go back to DU...a vote for anyone other than Bush is a vote for the democrats...blah, blah, blah.

[Dane]

For the THIRD time - D-O- N-O-T- P-O-S-T- T-O- M-E

Did you miss your school bus this morning, while sitting in the corner holding with your hands to your ears screaming "lalalalalalalalalalala".

[RiflemanSharpe]

He will get 51 to 55% popular vote and 320+ electoral vote. The "base" has long been factored out, it has been factored out since 1992.


Bush 41 lost in 1992.

[FITZ]

Bush is toast.

Let's hope he catches on and starts turning to the right --- the democrats can beat him on all the spending issues and they've got the vote of the illegals (former PRI party voters) sewn up. Bush needs to slash spending STAT --- get that deficit down. He was trying to run to the left of Dean to take his voters away --- but he'd better get back to the Conservatives --- he's great on religion and abortion but he's got to come around on spending.

[Dane]

I do if its akin to stalking and the poster is pretty nutty.

And you KB, one who is purer than the wind driven snow, don't stalk threads to post your Buchanan/Hillary anti-business rants on threads day in and day out. LOL!

[Dane]

Bush 41 lost in 1992

Due to Perot. There is no Perot this year.

[FITZ]

What is usually suggested on these and other pages is a macho, macho send them back. Remember, there are 8-10 million of them and they came here to work and most do.

All are not working --- the overall welfare program use is 35-42% depending on where you get your statistics, and many of the working brought in children and elderly who aren't working. There are only about 2 million jobs in agriculture. That doesn't really provide them that many jobs.

[Happy2BMe]

QUOTE:

What else could explain the president doing the following:

proposing a politically unpopular amnesty program for illegal aliens;

raising spending on domestic programs by bigger percentages than any of his predecessors, including Democrats;

proposing a vague manned mission to Mars without providing even the least compelling reasons, goals and objectives?

Bush has made many other mistakes in his term, but these whoppers are very recent gaffes made leading up to an election year.

UNQUOTE.

Yes, we did beg him. The only ones he is listening to are Vincente Fox and 10 million illegal migrants blackmailing him to grant blanket amnesty (not called by that name).

His bid to pander to the Mexican vote may well cost him dearly in November.

[BlueAngel]

Thats right. Perot did endorse Bush. I remember he was on Larry King. It was the same day the DUI story came out. So it didn't get alot of play. Just like the dems planned it.

[RiflemanSharpe]

Bush 41 lost in 1992
Due to Perot. There is no Perot this year.


Perot was able to enter the race and take those votes because Bush's policies. A good number of people were fed up with him. Bush took the base for granted and lost.

[af_vet_rr]

Couldn't happen to a nicer socialist...

I'll admit, I had to laugh. Too bad we don't get to pick which GOP candidate runs for President.

[Dane]

Yes, we did beg him

LOL! Are you royalty or something, with your use of the royal "we".

Joe Farah is not the King of the Conservatives, even though he thinks so from his cyber kingdom out in the wilderness.

[Dane]

Perot was able to enter the race and take those votes because Bush's policies. A good number of people were fed up with him. Bush took the base for granted and lost

And you gave us Clinton. Thanks for nothing, although the Chinese are probably happy with you all for all the military secrets they got.

[RiflemanSharpe]

I like your tagline, I will be writing him in in the primaries.

[RiflemanSharpe]

Perot was able to enter the race and take those votes because Bush's policies. A good number of people were fed up with him. Bush took the base for granted and lost
And you gave us Clinton. Thanks for nothing, although the Chinese are probably happy with you all for all the military secrets they got.


I agree, 41 opened the door for Perot and that gave us Clinton. And no I did not vote for Perot. But I fear that GWB's shift to the left will give us Kerry or Dean.

[Dane]

I like your tagline, I will be writing him in in the primaries

Do you plan to vote in more than one primary?

Is Terry MaCauliffe funding you?

[Theodore R.]

Joseph Farah may be the one prognosticator who is right on the money here. People "want" to vote Democrat. They are just looking for someone to provide the transportation to the polls!!!! Bush is alienating even the 537 FL voters who provided his 2000 margin of victory. Karl Rove better undergo the therapy that Howard Dean was recommending for Bush. The whole thing can deteriorate in the next month right before our eyes.

[Dane]

I agree, 41 opened the door for Perot and that gave us Clinton. And no I did not vote for Perot. But I fear that GWB's shift to the left will give us Kerry or Dean

Well it seems that think Bush is worse than Kerry or Dean, IMO. Your rhetoric is succor to them.