[nicmarlo]

the alternatives to our current POTUS are enough to scare even Edar Allen Poe into sobriety.

That's a great way of putting it; I agree.

But you couldn't convince some people in here that as I said before I think would rather see W go hard right and LOSE.

Unfortunately, that's exactly what would happen. And, on the flip side, that's what IS happening with the DEMs. They have gone so far left that many centrist Democrats are "abandoning" ship and coming over/voting Republican, as we have witnessed the past couple years.....taking Senate seats and Governships previously unheard of as Republican before!

[Moby Grape]

You are missing the point...it is NOT a matter of social conservative desire for Bush to go "hard right" as you put it (which is not a correct assesment).

This is simple.....the programs, and growth of programs, that Candy Man George is proposing will BANKRUPT this nation...and a bankrupt nation is a nation in peril...

We have on one hand, a president who does have the courage and conviction to go after those who would, if left alone, come to our shores with intent to kill us all....Sadly, we have on the on the other hand, a president who does not understand that the blank check social programs he is proposing will soon lead to economic meltdown (remember Russia).

Our votes have become finger-in-the-dyke votes.....with a democrat, the dyke gets BLOWN up...with Candy Man George, the dyke will eventually collapse from the pressures...and the flood will be great.

NO ONE at FR can accurately accuse me of being a Bush basher....LONG record of defending Bush, and pointing out that the alternative ( a dem president and all the JUDGES they would appoint) is NOT partiotic choice....but GOD HELP US, we need a Congress that will say NO to the Candy Man.