Bussing was not a part of Brown vs Board of Education. Brown decided that "separate is not equal" and required equal access to the nearest school. The objective was to "stop segregation".
Subsequently, the judicial objective was altered to "achieve integration". Thence, bussing...
Never said that it was. Please re-read my post. What I said was that the objective was to end Jim Crow - you see, we agree. What I then said was that the means to achive this end was to site "scientific studies" that supposedly documented that black children could only achive their potential in the presence of white children. You can read the Supreme Court decision yourself if you doubt me. (By the way, it was Thomas Sowell who first pointed out the importance of this logic)
Given the reasoning behind the position, it's pretty clear that active integration, rather than simply stopping active segregation, would be the logical results of the decision. Hence bussing logically and inevitably followed.
I think that Brown vs BOE is a real good example of a common failure of liberalism: the failure to take into account the affects and consequences of the decisions that are being made. Consequently, no matter how bad or unjust a situation is, you can pretty much count on a liberal solution making it worse.