Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
And I'm sure Winston-Salem has a surplus in their budget in order to fight the lawsuit which is sure to ensue. The Moore lawsuit is going to cost the taxpayers of Alabama somewhere around $300,000

Yea, well, that is only if you are stupid enough to pay a lawyer to defend the suit. The judge is more than capable enough to make up his mind without the city having to spend gobs of cash on a lawyer to argue the merits.

When it is time to present your case, enter a few well known documents as evidence (including current U.S. currency, pictures of the Supreme Court chambers, etc.), rest your case and wait for a decision that likely has been made before the judge ever heard one word of the trial (which way it goes depends on the judge).

The only way to win the game is not to play it. Let the other side spend all they want. Get caught up in the lawyer and spending game and you lose from day one.

103 posted on 01/19/2004 3:51:28 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan
The state of Alabama is not paying Judge Moore's lawyers. They'll have to pay the plaintiff's lawyers. Moore was the defendant in the case and he lost.
126 posted on 01/19/2004 5:45:26 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson