Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T'wit
=== I'd rather nothing be shown than get the wrong story out.



I'm glad to hear you say this. There is that part of me so desperate to have any attention at all given this story that I'm tempted to cave and just wish it were out there.

But, in addition to Galster's very real claims, I too would rather we not risk getting some Oliver Stone version of the story which only compounds the coverage afforded by passage of time to the actors in this story.
22 posted on 01/19/2004 8:32:11 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5; doug from upland
Thanks, Askel. We've been disappointed so many times by weak coverage or cover-ups or news shows backing off the story. Of course I want the story out too, but something here is not passing the sniff test.

Doug, I know you'll be careful, and your lawyer may be a gem, but she may conceivably have an agenda. Her position on a Clinton-appointed board is not reassuring. Clinton was, after all, a direct party to the tainted blood scam. Check out everything you can, as I will at my end.

29 posted on 01/19/2004 9:38:47 AM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson