Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PokeyJoe
The USA signed a treaty outside of the UN before the UN treaty was proposed that disallows sovreignty over the stars and I agree with that treaty. The UN treaty pretty much dupliated the earlier treaty.
50 posted on 01/18/2004 8:45:30 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
Name a Star

and if sovreignty is disallowed, then why do we allow people to claim that they can name stars? Who owns that right? What judicial body will recognize such a name? And if naming a star is okay, why can't I plant a flag as a private citizen?

If I land on Mars as a private citizen, what is to stop me from claiming a Martian Basin, full of some precious metal, as the Territory of PokeyJoe, and vote myself - as the sole inhabitant - subject to the United States Constitution.

73 posted on 01/19/2004 9:30:00 AM PST by PokeyJoe (This tagline got outsourced to India. Pleased we are posting to this forum with our better skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Destro
The USA signed a treaty outside of the UN before the UN treaty was proposed that disallows sovreignty over the stars and I agree with that treaty.

You can not have sovereignty over anything you can not defend. Sort of like our Southern borders.

80 posted on 01/19/2004 10:06:12 AM PST by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson