To: PokeyJoe
The USA signed a treaty outside of the UN before the UN treaty was proposed that disallows sovreignty over the stars and I agree with that treaty. The UN treaty pretty much dupliated the earlier treaty.
50 posted on
01/18/2004 8:45:30 PM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Name a Star and if sovreignty is disallowed, then why do we allow people to claim that they can name stars? Who owns that right? What judicial body will recognize such a name? And if naming a star is okay, why can't I plant a flag as a private citizen?
If I land on Mars as a private citizen, what is to stop me from claiming a Martian Basin, full of some precious metal, as the Territory of PokeyJoe, and vote myself - as the sole inhabitant - subject to the United States Constitution.
73 posted on
01/19/2004 9:30:00 AM PST by
PokeyJoe
(This tagline got outsourced to India. Pleased we are posting to this forum with our better skills.)
To: Destro
The USA signed a treaty outside of the UN before the UN treaty was proposed that disallows sovreignty over the stars and I agree with that treaty. You can not have sovereignty over anything you can not defend. Sort of like our Southern borders.
80 posted on
01/19/2004 10:06:12 AM PST by
itsahoot
(The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson