Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
Don't know. Wouldn't be considered inappropriate the first time a terrorist decided to become blonde. Or enlist one. Certainly you wouldn't have us only look at turban-wearing bearded guys with neon signs over their heads flashing "Terrorist".

I'm not suggesting I have the answer to that question either. What I am suggesting is that such behavior on the part of screeners has logical consequences. Those include providing an incentive for people to utilize other modes of transport. I can hardly fault them for that, as some on this thread seem wont to do.

71 posted on 01/18/2004 10:00:43 AM PST by NittanyLion (E-A-G-L-E-S - Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
What I am suggesting is that such behavior on the part of screeners has logical consequences. Those include providing an incentive for people to utilize other modes of transport. I can hardly fault them for that, as some on this thread seem wont to do.

But suggesting that the airlines deserve to go under for attempting to find weapons borne by passengers, and that the country should want to live without air travel as a way of life and as a loss to the economy, is silly as a goal and as a security decision. It isn't as bad as they say, and the exaggerations of the easily over-hassled shouldn't go unanswered by a dose of perspective.

81 posted on 01/18/2004 10:20:59 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson