Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DocCincy
Well, well, well....I think Fox will announce it as soon as their MJ coverage is completed. That should be around Tuesday.
7 posted on 01/16/2004 12:17:25 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
Shephard Smith said they have to get all their I's dotted and T's crossed before they report this breaking news. Looks like this is the news - Fox just didn't get it before MSNBC. Good for President Bush!!!!
12 posted on 01/16/2004 12:19:05 PM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Well, well, well....I think Fox will announce it as soon as their MJ coverage is completed. That should be around Tuesday.

ROFLMAO!!!! I'm absolutely sick of their obsession with this damn case. I stopped watching Fox News and foxnews.com has been taken off my favorites list. Methinks they're getting a bit cocky and careless.

33 posted on 01/16/2004 12:22:58 PM PST by geedee (All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
MJ coverage

Argh *@#!*&@ Michael Jackson coverage. Fox News actually broke away from Katherine Harris' announcement earlier so that we could see Michael Jackson's people milling around outside the courtroom earlier.

46 posted on 01/16/2004 12:25:11 PM PST by alnick (The American people would rather reach for the stars than reach for excuses why we shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw; All
I would be happy never to hear the words "Neverland Ranch" and "Michael Jackson" again in my life--unless it's in the same sentence as "Will never be mentioned again on this news channel."
168 posted on 01/16/2004 12:43:08 PM PST by homemom (Watch and be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
"Well, well, well....I think Fox will announce it as soon as their MJ coverage is completed. That should be around Tuesday."

This syndrome of having to be "the first", to "scoop" the competition, is a holdover from the 30's, 40's, and some of the 50's...and relates mainly to newspapers.

In this day of digital electronics, coupled with a vast majority of left-leaning media...especially CNN (clinton News Network), all being first means it, they told the lie first.

This preoccupation with being "first" - akin to the male preoccupation with "size" - amounts only to a pissing contest between media outlets. And "inside joke", if you will.

Consider - most of the news happens during the working day, while most of us are at work. Very few businesses have a TV playing all day long, so the first ANY OF US hear about it is when we are driving home, or after we arrive home. THEN...we turn on the channel of our choice/preference anyway, so...if I prefer FOX news, and it's the "first" place I hear about something...then, to me, "FOX was first".

It's not a horse race...even though there are some "horse's asses" on CNN...their spin is unbearable.

I think that about describes the difference between liberals and conservatives...liberals think "FIRST", Conservative think "ACCURACY".

For instance, I vividly remember WHERE I was when I heard about Kennedy being shot...but I don't have a clue as to what station it was on. But I do remember the news persons on the TV that night, after I arrived home...but they were NOT the FIRST.

Regarding CNN...sometimes being "FIRST" just amounts to "premature ejaculation".
452 posted on 01/16/2004 2:26:02 PM PST by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson