Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Loc123
Loc

it is not just about the Iraq war or just Afghanistan or Terrorism

these are add ons. We need to be in an alert state, strong defense.

Sec Rumsfeld has a well known or rather widely discussed -- perceived as a grudge against Army. The Rumsfeld Commision Report published for President Clinton (yep) has a plan in it to go special ops, high tech, space/air force.

Isn't working. We need boots, trained boots on the ground.

Sec Def gambled on the wrong technologies, billions to boondoggles. While there is good stuff around --now, just not sexy or so I have heard.
10 posted on 01/13/2004 4:37:03 PM PST by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: inPhase
Which technologies are disfunct?

Rumsfeld fought the Crusader and is opting for a more 21st century Army. If we take my advice: eliminate certain support functions and increase infantry numbers--then we will have the necessary boots to project high power.

Also, Rumsfeld's lighter, faster, meaner approach to the Op: Iraqi Freedom worked like a charm. The occupation could have been improved, but I don't think the invasion could have.

Keep in mind that the military went into relative statis during the 90s; Rumsfeld has to work with that.
14 posted on 01/15/2004 10:22:30 PM PST by Loc123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson