To: sinkspur
The question is, is 15% chance of getting AIDS better than no chance of getting AIDS?
And if the sex is non-consensual, it is rape...a baseball bat would be preferable, yes.
168 posted on
01/13/2004 2:57:19 PM PST by
Petronski
(I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
To: Petronski
The question is, is 15% chance of getting AIDS better than no chance of getting AIDS?That's not the question here. She cannot abstain; he won't let her. So, is some protection better than none?
169 posted on
01/13/2004 2:59:06 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: Petronski; sinkspur
"...a baseball bat would be preferable, yes."
Might I suggest that a machete would be more "inculturated" and probably more scriptural as well:
Mt 18,8 "And if thy hand, or thy foot scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee to go into life maimed or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into everlasting fire.
9 And if thy husband's member scandalizes thee, cut it out, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee having a eunuch husband to enter into life, than having all the parts to be cast into hell fire."
From the Deacon Tantum ergo translation, copyright whatever.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson