Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: americanSoul
Why the recall of the US fighters? One poster mentioned it was because they had nukes. Come on, as if this is all they were armed with? What about cannon?

They were F-4B Phantom IIs. No cannon--the Department of Defense had believed all the hype about "push-button beyond-visual-range air combat."

And in those days, once the carrier got east of Malta, it was a SIOP asset, and the alert birds were nuclear-armed.

46 posted on 01/13/2004 10:29:28 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah; B4Ranch
They were F-4B Phantom IIs. No cannon--the Department of Defense had believed all the hype about "push-button beyond-visual-range air combat."

So does that mean some kinda missiles? If so, then they should have been able to hit within visual range also, no?

I just find it hard to believe that all they had was nukes. How would they defend themselves against air attack?

52 posted on 01/13/2004 11:06:05 AM PST by americanSoul (Better to die on your feet, than live on your knees. Live Free or Die. I should be in New Hampshire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson