Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS 'Liberty' hit was unintentional, says CIA
JPost ^ | 01-13-04 | JANINE ZACHARIA

Posted on 01/13/2004 6:29:49 AM PST by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: sinkspur
Another non-argument. And a colosally STUPID non-argument as well.

sinkspur, I know you're ticked off that I haven't been permanently banned, so I felt that in order to keep your blood pressure above normal, I should include something that was easy for you to jump on and requiring no thought.

Care to make any comments about #7, #11, or #12 where I explain where I am getting my information from........the JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY

Come on say that they are a ragtag outfit, show us your true idiocy.

Discussion with you closed.

21 posted on 01/13/2004 7:36:30 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Earlier in the morning of June 8, the Israelis had surveyed and identified a ship in the area as the USS Liberty. A neutral green marker was placed on a model to represent the Liberty's position. Two hours later, the marker was removed since the ship's position would have changed by then and a new senior Israeli official came on duty who was not informed of the Liberty's presence in the area, Oren explained.

The removal of the marker, a miscalculation of the speed at which the Liberty was traveling that would have indicated it was not a warship, and a breakdown in communication between the Israeli Navy and Army were all Israeli errors that contributed to orders to attack the ship.

Hard to believe that the best military in the world could be capable of such incompetence!

Question. Were any of the Israeli military personnel court martialed for this? They obviously knew they had screwed up. What are the names of the officers punished for their ineptitude?

22 posted on 01/13/2004 7:41:03 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
You could go to the link in 11, quoted selectively (they conclude it was an accident) as the JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY not an entertainment newspaper, the multitude of USS Liberty threads for the pilots comments or to his first interview.

Spector had always refused to discuss the attack on the USS Liberty, which killed 34 US sailors and wounded 172, or even be revealed as the pilot who led the attack on her. Until now.

"I did not fire on the Liberty as a human target. I was sent to attack a sailing vessel. This ship was on an escape route from the El Arish area, which at that same moment had heavy smoke rising from it," Spector said.

"It was thought to be an Egyptian vessel. This ship positively did not have any symbol or flag that I could see. What I was concerned with was that it was not one of ours. I looked for the symbol of our navy, which was a large white cross on its deck," he told The Jerusalem Post. "This was not there, so it wasn't one of ours."

The concern of the IAF was that Spector and his wingman, who had been diverted from the Suez Canal, would strike one of the Israel Navy ships in pursuit of the vessel, which was assumed to be Egyptian. IAF archival recordings of the pilots' radio transmission of the actual attack obtained by the Post show that Spector was specifically requested to verify that the ship was a military vessel and not Israeli.

According to the June 8, 1967, radio transmission, Spector said: "I can't identify it but in any case it's a military ship."

Speaking of the event 36 years later may have caused Spector to mix what he remembered with what he may have read and his testimony does not always match archival facts.

"I circled it twice and it did not fire on me. My assumption was that it was likely to open fire at me and nevertheless I slowed down and I looked and there was positively no flag. Just to make sure I photographed it," said Spector, who retired from active duty as a brigadier-general in 1984.

Experts intimately acquainted with the incident said that the only photos Spector took were from his gun-sight camera during his strafing run. Regardless of whether the 455-foot ship bristling with eavesdropping antennas flew a US flag, which it evidently did from its starboard halyard, that banner was shot off in Spector's first strafing pass.

"I was told on the radio that it was an Egyptian ship off the Gaza coast. Hit it. The luck of the ship was that I was armed only with light ammunition [30mm] against aircraft. If I had had a bomb it would be sitting on the bottom today like the Titanic. I promise you," Spector said.

The 30mm rounds were armor piercing, which to this day led Liberty survivors to believe they had been under rocket attack. Spector's first pass ignited a fire which caused the ship to billow black smoke. Ironically, Spector transmitted he suspected the Liberty was putting out smoke to deliberately mask itself.

"Every order is given by commanders and the last one to receive it has to decide whether he will pull the trigger or not. In this instance I was the fighter. I checked what I had to check [i.e. that it was a military ship and not one of ours] and pulled the trigger," Spector said.

"The crew should be thankful for their luck [that I was on an air-to-air mission and did not have any bombs]. It is a pity we attacked. I'm sorry for poor Capt. (William Loren) McGonagle, who was wounded in the leg and the other guys who were killed and wounded."

"I'm sorry for the mistake. Years later my mates dropped flowers on the site where the ship was attacked," Spector said. "I'm the last guy who has a problem with admitting mistakes and asking for forgiveness. There was a mistake, but it wasn't my mistake."

He added he remains baffled that the conspiracy theories live on that Israel deliberately attacked the US intelligence ship. He suggested it might be due to anti-Semitism, or anti-Israeli sentiments.

"I know that after the war one of the first things that was done was the establishment of a [US] senator's inquiry. I know this personally, because I was called upon to testify before it. They came to the country and I was questioned. I told them what I told you just now – that there was a mistake. I am sorry for the mistake. In war mistakes happen," Spector said.

He said that he had never in the past 36 years ever met with any of the Liberty survivors, but has no qualms about doing so now.

"They must understand that a mistake was made here," Spector said. "The fool is one who wanders about in the dark in dangerous places, so they should not come with any complaints."

23 posted on 01/13/2004 7:43:09 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Your link doesn't work.

Oh, and I don't care whether you're banned or not. Your posts are target-rich.

24 posted on 01/13/2004 7:43:42 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; sinkspur; veronica
Care to make any comments about #7, #11, or #12 where I explain where I am getting my information from........the JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY...Come on say that they are a ragtag outfit, show us your true idiocy.

They're an excellent source, thanks for bringing them to the thread and vouching for them.

I'd suggest everyone read them. I'm glad the matter's settled for you and you agree it was a greivous accident.

-------------------


The USS Liberty


The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was a grievous error, largely attributable to the fact that it occurred in the midst of the confusion of a full-scale war in 1967. Ten official United States investigations and three official Israeli inquiries have all conclusively established the attack was a tragic mistake.

On June 8, 1967, the fourth day of the Six-Day War, the Israeli high command received reports that Israeli troops in El Arish were being fired upon from the sea, presumably by an Egyptian vessel, as they had a day before. The United States had announced that it had no naval forces within hundreds of miles of the battle front on the floor of the United Nations a few days earlier; however, the USS Liberty, an American intelligence ship assigned to monitor the fighting, arrived in the area, 14 miles off the Sinai coast, as a result of a series of United States communication failures, whereby messages directing the ship not to approach within 100 miles were not received by the Liberty. The Israelis mistakenly thought this was the ship doing the shelling and war planes and torpedo boats attacked, killing 34 members of the Liberty's crew and wounding 171.

Numerous mistakes were made by both the United States and Israel. For example, the Liberty was first reported — incorrectly, as it turned out — to be cruising at 30 knots (it was later recalculated to be 28 knots). Under Israeli (and U.S.) naval doctrine at the time, a ship proceeding at that speed was presumed to be a warship. The sea was calm and the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry found that the Liberty's flag was very likely drooped and not discernible; moreover, members of the crew, including the Captain, Commander William McGonagle, testified that the flag was knocked down after the first or second assault.

According to Israeli Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin's memoirs, there were standing orders to attack any unidentified vessel near the shore.1 The day fighting began, Israel had asked that American ships be removed from its coast or that it be notified of the precise location of U.S. vessels.2 The Sixth Fleet was moved because President Johnson feared being drawn into a confrontation with the Soviet Union. He also ordered that no aircraft be sent near Sinai.

A CIA report on the incident issued June 13, 1967, also found that an overzealous pilot could mistake the Liberty for an Egyptian ship, the El Quseir. After the air raid, Israeli torpedo boats identified the Liberty as an Egyptian naval vessel. When the Liberty began shooting at the Israelis, they responded with the torpedo attack, which killed 28 of the sailors.

Initially, the Israelis were terrified that they had attacked a Soviet ship and might have provoked the Soviets to join the fighting.3 Once the Israelis were sure what had happened, they reported the incident to the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv and offered to provide a helicopter for the Americans to fly out to the ship and any help they required to evacuate the injured and salvage the ship. The offer was accepted and a U.S. naval attaché was flown to the Liberty.

Many of the survivors of the Liberty remain bitter, and are convinced the attack was deliberate as they make clear on their web site. In 1991, columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak trumpeted their discovery of an American who said he had been in the Israeli war room when the decision was made to knowingly attack the American ship.4 In fact, that individual, Seth Mintz, wrote a letter to the Washington Post on November 9, 1991, in which he said he was misquoted by Evans and Novak and that the attack, was, in fact, a "case of mistaken identity." Moreover, the man who Mintz originally said had been with him, a Gen. Benni Matti, does not exist.

Also, contrary to claims that an Israeli pilot identified the ship as American on a radio tape, no one has ever produced this tape. In fact, the official Israeli Air Force tape clearly established that no such identification of the ship was made by the Israeli pilots prior to the attack. It also indicates that once the pilots became concerned about the identity of the ship, by virtue of reading its hull number, they terminated the attack. The tapes do not contain any statement suggesting the pilots saw a U.S. flag before the attack.5 Critics claimed the Israeli tape was doctored, but the National Security Agency of the United States released formerly top secret transcripts in July 2003 that confirmed the Israeli version.

A U.S. spy plane was sent to the area as soon as the NSA learned of the attack on the Liberty and recorded the conversations of two Israeli Air Force helicopter pilots, which took place between 2:30 and 3:37 p.m. on June 8. The orders radioed to the pilots by their supervisor at the Hatzor base instructing them to search for Egyptian survivors from the "Egyptian warship" that had just been bombed were also recorded by the NSA. "Pay attention. The ship is now identified as Egyptian," the pilots were informed. Nine minutes later, Hatzor told the pilots the ship was believed to be an Egyptian cargo ship. At 3:07, the pilots were first told the ship might not be Egyptian and were instructed to search for survivors and inform the base immediately the nationality of the first person they rescued. It was not until 3:12 that one of the pilots reported that he saw an American flag flying over the ship at which point he was instructed to verify if it was indeed a U.S. vessel.6

In October 2003, the first Israeli pilot to reach the ship broke his 36-year silence on the attack. Brig.-Gen. Yiftah Spector, a triple ace, who shot down 15 enemy aircraft and took part in the 1981 raid on the Iraqi nuclear reactor, said he had been told an Egyptian ship was off the Gaza coast. "This ship positively did not have any symbol or flag that I could see. What I was concerned with was that it was not one of ours. I looked for the symbol of our navy, which was a large white cross on its deck. This was not there, so it wasn't one of ours." The Jerusalem Post obtained a recording of Spector's radio transmission in which he said, "I can't identify it, but in any case it's a military ship."7

Spector's plane was not armed with bombs or, he said, he would have sunk the Liberty. Instead he fired 30mm armor piercing rounds that led the American survivors to believe they had been under rocket attack. His first pass ignited a fire, which caused the ship to billow black smoke that Spector thought was a ruse to conceal the ship. Spector acknowledged in the Post interview that he made a mistake, and said he admitted it when called to testify in an inquiry by a U.S. senator. "I'm sorry for the mistake," he said. "Years later my mates dropped flowers on the site where the ship was attacked."

None of Israel's accusers can explain why Israel would deliberately attack an American ship at a time when the United States was Israel's only friend and supporter in the world. Confusion in a long line of communications, which occurred in a tense atmosphere on both the American and Israeli sides (five messages from the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the ship to remain at least 25 miles — the last four said 100 miles — off the Egyptian coast arrived after the attack was over) is a more probable explanation.

Accidents caused by “friendly fire” are common in wartime. In 1988, the U.S. Navy mistakenly downed an Iranian passenger plane, killing 290 civilians. During the Gulf War, 35 of the 148 Americans who died in battle were killed by “friendly fire.” In April 1994, two U.S. Black Hawk helicopters with large U.S. flags painted on each side were shot down by U.S. Air Force F-15s on a clear day in the “no fly” zone of Iraq, killing 26 people. In April 2002, an American F-16 dropped a bomb that killed four Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. In fact, the day before the Liberty was attacked, Israeli pilots accidentally bombed one of their own armored columns.8

Retired Admiral, Shlomo Erell, who was Chief of the Navy in Israel in June 1967, told the Associated Press (June 5, 1977): “No one would ever have dreamt that an American ship would be there. Even the United States didn't know where its ship was. We were advised by the proper authorities that there was no American ship within 100 miles.”

Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara told Congress on July 26, 1967: “It was the conclusion of the investigatory body, headed by an admiral of the Navy in whom we have great confidence, that the attack was not intentional.”

In 1987, McNamara repeated his belief that the attack was a mistake, telling a caller on the “Larry King Show” that he had seen nothing in the 20 years since to change his mind that there had been no “cover­up.”8

Israel apologized for the tragedy and paid nearly $13 million in humanitarian reparations to the United States and to the families of the victims in amounts established by the U.S. State Department. The matter was officially closed between the two governments by an exchange of diplomatic notes on December 17, 1987.

Notes

1For the most comprehensive analysis, see A. Jay Cristol, The Liberty Incident. (Washington, D.C.: Brassey's Inc., 2002);Yitzhak Rabin, The Rabin Memoirs, (CA: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 108-109.

2Rabin, p. 110.

3Dan Kurzman, Soldier of Peace: The Life of Yitzhak Rabin, (NY: HarperCollins, 1998), pp. 224-227; Rabin, p. 108-109.

4Washington Post, (November 6, 1991).

5Hirsh Goodman, “Messrs. Errors and No Facts,” Jerusalem Report (November 21, 1991).

6Nathan Guttman, "Memos show Liberty attack was an error," Ha'aretz, (July 9, 2003).

7"Pilot who bombed 'Liberty' talks to 'Post," Jerusalem Post (October 10, 2003).

8Hirsh Goodman and Ze'ev Schiff, “The Attack on the Liberty,” Atlantic Monthly, (September 1984).

9The Larry King Show” (radio), (February 5, 1987).


25 posted on 01/13/2004 7:50:32 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

I didn't bother with yesterday's thread, Israel blamed for USS Liberty attack, but for those who care to partake it's USS Liberty time again.

26 posted on 01/13/2004 7:52:27 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
http://www.nsa.gov/docs/efoia/released/liberty.html

This is what was released for public consumption by the US Gov.

__________________________________________________________

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

Boston was senior legal counsel to the Navy's original 1967 review of the attack. He said in the sworn statement that he stayed silent for years because he's a military man, and "when orders come ... I follow them."

He said he felt compelled to "share the truth" following the publication of a recent book, "The Liberty Incident," which concluded the attack was unintentional.

27 posted on 01/13/2004 7:57:04 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYFriend
Read "Body of Secrets"

Even though the author is a lib and has a bogus agenda there is no douby the hit was deliberate to cover up some messy elements of the war.

28 posted on 01/13/2004 7:57:08 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'm not partaking, I'm just reporting the "new" news from the State Dept. forum.
29 posted on 01/13/2004 8:00:55 AM PST by veronica ("Clinton happens"....F. Lee Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY
30 posted on 01/13/2004 8:01:41 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; veronica; SJackson
"The panel, which was open to the public, became raucous at times when survivors of the Liberty attack and a relative of a sailor killed in the incident yelled out to protest that the panel included two people who represented Israel's position, while survivors were not invited to participate."

Something about disallowing any of the survivors - those who were live witnesses to the attack - smacks of coverup.

Don't buy it.

31 posted on 01/13/2004 8:02:35 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I don't buy it either. Another US flag was raised within minutes of the first one being shot down.
32 posted on 01/13/2004 8:09:16 AM PST by B4Ranch (Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I've got a bridge for sale.
33 posted on 01/13/2004 8:11:49 AM PST by suekas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
If you believe that the Israelis did not know that the Liberty was American, you probably also believe that Clinton was honest.
34 posted on 01/13/2004 8:58:21 AM PST by curmudgeonII (Typical apology by the pro-Zionists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
It's ALL a giant nefarious plot on the part of the Jooose!

In all these threads I've yet to see any credible reason why Israel would deliberately attack an American vessel.

35 posted on 01/13/2004 9:17:30 AM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: davisfh
Here's a rational and believable explanation... the Israelis thought it was an Egyptian ship flying US colors.
36 posted on 01/13/2004 9:19:19 AM PST by thoughtomator ("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Thanx for the link. I'll have to read it all when I have some more time.
37 posted on 01/13/2004 9:22:42 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Flags are misidentified. Do you really want me to recount the number of times American or Britishforces attacked allied ships when they KNEW that there were allied ships in an area?!
If Israel planned for the USS Liberty to be sunk, they would have used jets with anti-ship bombs. (AP 1000lb, torpedos...)
38 posted on 01/13/2004 9:52:35 AM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Just out of curiousity: do you believe that the US Navy, with malice aforethought, deliberately shot down that Iran Air flight in 1988?
39 posted on 01/13/2004 9:55:30 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; veronica
Yes, the Liberty was flying the American flag and the fighter pilot said so on the radio.

Don't allow survivors to participate and you can get any report you want.

Not allowing the survivors to participate???WTFIT? These are precisely the people you want to have take part. They were THERE.

Also: Fighters from a nearby US carrier were scrambled to the Liberty's aid, but before they got there, they were recalled on f***ing Macnamara's orders.

I don't believe for one nanosecond that the Israeli pilots didn't know it was an American ship. The air and sea attack lasted quite some time, 75min in fact. Those who managed to get into life rafts, were then strafed by Israeli gun boats.

The Israelis claim there was no pre-attack reconnaissance, but in fact about an hour before the attack, a LOW flying IDF reconnaissance aircraft was seen circling the Liberty.

For pic see http://www.ussliberty.org/00/0044.htm

They could plainly see it was American boys there on deck.

Caveat: this is rumoured at in the book "Assault on the USS Liberty":

One reason for the attack MAY have been to cover up the killing of some few hundred Egyptian POWs in the Sinai. They feared the Americans on the Liberty would get wind of this. Again, I emphasize that this is conjecture from the book.

Now veronica, you use the term "usual suspects" referring to those who believe the attack was deliberate. So then the former JCS Chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer and Secretary of State Dean Rusk fall into this category.

I am a firm supporter of Israel and think it is the most free country in the Middle East and that Israel is the victim, definitely not the aggressor in the conflict.

But on the Liberty issue, I gotta call it as I see it.

Shalom.

40 posted on 01/13/2004 10:03:55 AM PST by americanSoul (Better to die on your feet, than live on your knees. Live Free or Die. I should be in New Hampshire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson