Posted on 01/12/2004 4:30:17 PM PST by Alissa
I seem to remember the media wetting themselves when Ari said something about the cost of one bullet ....
That bozo ex-treasury secretary's new book bombshells are actually press conference material from three years ago. How shocking is that? I hope he credits Ari Fleisher with his material.
Most of those who say he's losing there vote, follow that sentence with "...if..." and then name something that hasn't even happened yet and, more than likely, is just a rumor.
I don't agree with ALL of the immigration policy he put out this week, but I am willing to see how it plays out. Call me ignorant, but that's the way I see it.
Speaking of voting . .
Question ...
After hearing President Bush's speech, do you approve of his immigration reform plan?
Yes
530 votes - 22%
No
1,576 votes - 65%
Undecided
291 votes - 12%
2,397 votes total; you voted "No"
Indirectly, it WAS because of 9-11. The Attack on America caused us to wake up and realize how truly catastrophic terror attacks could be.
....And Hussein has a history of supporting a variety of terrorists ---including religious terrorists.
.....And, uniquely among the world's dictators, Saddam openly financed terrorists, and enjoyed publicly boasting about it, repeatedly.
Obviously, he had to be target #1.
That bozo ex-treasury secretary's new book bombshells are actually press conference material from three years ago.
Yes...Now that you mention it, I think I remember hearing either Rumsfeld or Myers say that they took an old plan off the shelf & blew the dust off of it--that there are all sorts of war/ contigency plans laying for all sorts of scenarios laying around at the Pentagon. And that the dusty old plan was just a baseline thing that Franks looked at when he came up w/ his war plan.
Exactly where does he say that?
Q Thank you, President Fox. President Bush, is it true, as your former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill says, that you started planning for the invasion of Iraq within days of your inauguration? Do you feel betrayed? And should he have released those documents?
PRESIDENT BUSH: First, let me say, I appreciate former Secretary O'Neill's service to our country. We worked together during some difficult times. We worked together when the country was in recession, and now we're coming out of recession, which is positive news. We worked together when America was attacked on September the 11th, which changed how I viewed the world. September the 11th made me realize that America was no longer protected by oceans, and we had to take threats very seriously no matter where they may be materializing.
And, no, the stated policy of my administration towards Saddam Hussein was very clear. Like the previous administration, we were for regime change. And in the initial stages of the administration, as you might remember, we were dealing with Desert Badger, or fly-overs and fly-betweens and looks, and so we were fashioning policy along those lines. And then, all of a sudden, September the 11th hit. And as the President of the United States, my most solemn obligation is to protect the security of the American people. That's my -- to me that's the most solemn thing an American President -- or any president -- must do. And I took that duty very seriously.
And as you know, not only did we deal with the Taliban, we gave -- working through the United Nations and working through international community, we made it clear that Saddam Hussein should disarm. And like he had done with a lot of previous resolutions, he ignored the world's demands. And now he's no longer in power, and the world is better for it. The Iraqi people are better for it; America is better for it; Mexico is better for it. The world is more peaceful as a result of Saddam Hussein not being in power.
And the task at hand, Mr. President -- and he and I -- he knows this fully well -- is to make sure that the aspirations of the Iraqi people are allowed to flourish. And we'll get there. It's a tough task right now. It's hard work, but we've done hard work in the past. And a free Iraq is going to be in the world's interest.
Thank you very much.
PRESIDENT FOX: Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon.
END 2:45 P.M. (Local)
That he is wrong, imho, is not a question that an adoring media has chosen to raise.
Bush handled the question extremely well, btw, looking generous while O'Neill came off as churlish.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
I seem to remember the media wetting themselves when Ari said something about the cost of one bullet ....
Now, just Stop It. You're reminding me of how much I miss Ari!
Friday evening, on the hourly radio news update, the anchor quoted an unnamed "administration official" who said, "we didn't listen to O'Neill when he was here, why should we start now?"
ROFL
You just proved the point. The GOP wrote off the unappeasable "base" in 2000. The history of the "base" voting 3rd party ala Perot 1992, sitting at home in a huff in 1996 and 2million of them sitting at home or voting for PJB again in 2000 removed all doubt that the "base" was an opposition party. Bush and the GOP now owns the center right and independents due to the complete take over by the fringe left of the democrat party. That places the GOP and Bush with about 55% of the vote for 2004. California was the first test of that new base with a moderate Republican wining a landslide against both a red meat conservative and a flaming liberal. Sorry guys but you can demand all you want but the "my way or the hi-way base" is on the hi-way with the GOP looking at them in the rear view mirror. You have only yourselves to blame.
And as the President of the United States, I, Bill Clinton, think to protect the security of the American people is a joke. What we need to do is tell everyone we are ok and find some more women to hit on, and ya know I take the pursuit of women very seriously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.