Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Finally, a President committed to returning to the Moon, going to Mars and beyond. Although I still say it should be up to the private sector to go back to the moon.
1 posted on 01/09/2004 5:09:46 AM PST by AntiKev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
20 Nevada 380.00
5
76.00
114
3.33
60.00
3

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/09/2004 5:11:13 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev
I wonder if he'll include Howard Dean in the announcement? After all, it's always good to have someone on the dais who seems to have been there before!
3 posted on 01/09/2004 5:14:38 AM PST by theDentist (Tagline deamed un-inhabitable. Condemned. New Location sought....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev; Poohbah; section9; Dog
The good news is we're getting ambitious.

The bad news is we're scrapping the shuttles - and I'd prefer to have our own form of getting to the space station as opposed to relying on the Europeans or Russians.

Time to bring back the X-30, X-33, and the Delta Clipper?
5 posted on 01/09/2004 8:36:31 AM PST by hchutch (Why did the Nazgul run from Arwen's flash flood? All they managed to do was to end up dying tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev
Will cost $$ we don't have....
Why not to send there the illegals ??
6 posted on 01/09/2004 8:38:40 AM PST by traumer (Even paranoids have enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev
Your post was SO RIGHT on target, I just HAD to post it again!!!

"Finally, a President committed to returning to the Moon, going to Mars and beyond. Although I still say it should be up to the private sector to go back to the moon."

NordP

7 posted on 01/09/2004 8:41:43 AM PST by NordP (Peace through Strength - W 2004 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev
The first Mars mission will be a fly-by. Perhaps they will enter Mars orbit, perhaps not. Either way it is a vastly simpler and cheaper mission than a Mars landing. It is also appropriate: there is no urgency to land on Mars. We are a long way from a sustainable base on Mars, and we should not conduct another one-off mission to either the moon or Mars.
10 posted on 01/09/2004 9:12:45 AM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiKev
"Finally, a President committed to returning to the Moon, going to Mars and beyond. Although I still say it should be up to the private sector to go back to the moon."

His daddy announced with great bravado the "Space Exploration Initiative". We started attempting to resurrect NERVA (nuclear rocket engine). Right on the line; a few of the original experts were still alive and some of the technical data still in existence. I was on that team.

Guess what? The instant Clinton was elected, the second thing he did (right after gays in the military) was to cancel SEI.

Now those remaining experts are dead and the technical data is in the great shredder in the sky.

--Boris

12 posted on 01/09/2004 1:25:17 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson