Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F16Fighter
I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired in their direction would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide.
574 posted on 01/12/2004 5:24:22 AM PST by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies ]


To: Ed_in_NJ
I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired in their direction would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide.

Then you're ultimately suggesting that we kill all those who attempt to cross our border. Pretending that you're not is right up there with Clinton saying that his willie in Monica's mouth didn't equal sex.

And, incidentally, you'd also make America's first capital misdemeanor.

575 posted on 01/12/2004 5:32:28 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

To: Ed_in_NJ
"I am not advocating that we kill all those that attempt to cross our border, but a few shots fired would likely be one of the most cost-effective measures available to stem the tide."

Upon posting a clear and concise warning, "a few shots fired in their direction" might not only be "cost effective," but America's right to do so in order to protect it's sovereignty AND have it's laws enforced.

For that we owe NO ONE an explanation.

577 posted on 01/12/2004 12:33:20 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson