Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Uh-huh. So, you're now spending gazillions of dollars AND doing so for extremely intrusive law enforcement not based on probable cause.

$100 billion a year is hardly gazillions. Last year, the Congress spent $33 billion on pork projects alone. Revisit that obscene Farm Bill of 2002, and you could easily come up with another $70 billion per year.

What is intrusive about law enforcement officials entering a place of business to check whether employees are legal? Government inspectors enter businesses all the time.

Posse Comitatus Act.

Posse Comitatus limits the use of the military for LAW ENFORCEMENT. It is quite in line with the Posse Comitatus Act for the military to patrol our borders and protect them from invasions, in this case an invasion of illegal immigrants.

Or is it your contention that if a hostile military ever attacked our homeland, the invasion would have to be repulsed by the sheriff's department?

450 posted on 01/09/2004 4:50:38 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies ]


To: kevao
What is intrusive about law enforcement officials entering a place of business to check whether employees are legal? Government inspectors enter businesses all the time.

And, in general, conservatives want a lot LESS of that, remember? We insist on things like "probable cause" and "search warrants," remember?

Posse Comitatus limits the use of the military for LAW ENFORCEMENT.

What's the term again? ILLEGAL immigration? Does that not imply that ENFORCING the LAWS against illegal immigration is LAW ENFORCEMENT?

It is quite in line with the Posse Comitatus Act for the military to patrol our borders and protect them from invasions, in this case an invasion of illegal immigrants.

Or is it your contention that if a hostile military ever attacked our homeland, the invasion would have to be repulsed by the sheriff's department?

Please explain which "hostile military" the illegal aliens belong to.

You've managed to argue both sides at once, AND lose both arguments at once.

451 posted on 01/09/2004 4:55:41 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson