Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kaloogian v. Jones in U.S. Senate Race - PRESS RELEASE
Howard Kaloogian for U.S. Senate Campaign ^ | 01-08-2003 | Howard Kaloogian

Posted on 01/08/2004 3:26:01 PM PST by Impeach98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Impeach98
The city of Huntington Park is a great case study for anyone wishing to understand Ms. Marin's candidacy.

Good. You did your homework on a timely basis.

I warned everyone on the forum weeks ago to do their e-homework before Marin's political history is "sanitized" based on my personal experience with the mysteriously disappearing historic quotes and activities of Bustamante and Cedillo when they became prominent and controversial.

61 posted on 01/08/2004 7:00:29 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DougLorenz
I'm not going to give your "Boxer's electable" comment the dignity of a response.

Grow up.

And while your in la-la land, in this place where FORMER STATE REP can win against a two term incumbent in the biggest state in the union, why don't we get Dan Quail to move to California and run him? I'm quite certain that in the world you discribe, he'll be a shoe in.

62 posted on 01/08/2004 8:27:11 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Your statement is idiotic. He's won twice statewide before. You can debate wether or not he'll be able to beat Boxer, but you can't say he's 'unelectable' because he has, in fact, been elected.

I'm all for electable, sane conservatives. Kaloogian is neither. Do you get his mailings? He has impressed me as someone who is big on talk, and not much more.

I'd be thrilled if David Dryer or Darryl Issa or someone more conservative was running, but seeming as I demand electability, as only by getting elected do you actually accomplish anything, I'll go with half a loaf over none at all. Boxer isn't even no loaf. She's negative loaf. If a credible candidate that is more conservative arises, I'd be inclined to support him. But until that point, I'd rather have a chance of taking the seat then having a 'pure' candidate who will get 40% of the vote.

63 posted on 01/08/2004 8:40:08 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Poohbah: "I've heard the man speak, and I've watched the crowd. He's great at talking to the party faithful. He bombs with anyone who isn't already a Republican."

Exactly. He's good at preaching to the choir, nothing more.


64 posted on 01/08/2004 8:42:32 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
You have GOT to be kidding. Northern California is THE MOST CONSERVATIVE part of the state. Boxer will be lucky to get 30% up here. Her votes are in LA and the Bay Area.

Ahem. The Bay Area is in Northern California, and it is MOST of the population thereof--the rest of Northern California is very thinly populated, aside from the liberal mecca of Sacramento.

Boxer's base is in Northern California, and it is formidable.

65 posted on 01/09/2004 4:56:16 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Gophack; SierraWasp
Ahem. The Bay Area is in Northern California, and it is MOST of the population thereof--the rest of Northern California is very thinly populated, aside from the liberal mecca of Sacramento. Boxer's base is in Northern California, and it is formidable.

Wow, I guess the reason you so often get California politics wrong begins with your ignorance of geography. You can get a map of California for about $1.95 at your local drugstore. Maybe you should pin it on the wall and study the state.

No, the Bay Area is the Bay Area, it is not in any way part of what is known as Northern California. Yes, San Francisco is north of Los Angeles, but this is the same mentality that would place Ventura and Bakersfield in Northern California.

The Bay Area is its own region, geographically, politically and demographically.

As for Sacramento, again your ignorance is breathtaking. The City of Sacramento is liberal, as municipalities almost always are. However the boundaries and population of the actual city are small. It is not big enough to change the conservative makeup of Northern California. I noted that Boxer would have a hard time breaking 30% in Northern California, most of that would come from the urban Sacramento region.

Sacramento County is a Republican and conservative county. It has been for some time. When you include the high-growth greater suburban Sacramento areas (the commuters) such as Roseville in Placer County, and the Eldorado Hills region, the Sacramento area gets even MORE conservative. It is far from being "thinly populated."

Sometime you ought to see California a little beyond Valencia (You can drive 9 hours in a straight line past it) and learn more about our large and politically complex state.

66 posted on 01/09/2004 9:31:08 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
No, the Bay Area is the Bay Area, it is not in any way part of what is known as Northern California. Yes, San Francisco is north of Los Angeles, but this is the same mentality that would place Ventura and Bakersfield in Northern California.

Actually, they're in Central California.

The Bay Area is its own region, geographically, politically and demographically.

Fine. Northern California isn't big enough to counter it.

It is far from being "thinly populated."

Compared to the Bay Area, which you insist on not including in Northern California just to split semantic hairs, it's thinly populated.

67 posted on 01/09/2004 9:39:52 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Actually, they're in Central California.

You really need to go get that map. I'm not making this stuff up. Fresno is in central California. Bakersfield, Hanford, etc. are in Central California. It is a growing and VERY conservative part of the state. The Bay Area is NOT in Central California.

If you are going to create your own regions of California, maybe you could rename it WESTERN California or LEFT-California, perhaps California-GAUCHE (I'll take credit for that one if you use it). At any rate, please post your new map on your profile page so the rest of us can understand what you are talking about.

At no time did I allege that Northern California was greater-than, equal-to, or an answer-to the socialism in the Bay Area. I simply stated that it was very conservative and that Barbara Boxer would be lucky to get 30% up here.

68 posted on 01/09/2004 9:56:52 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
The city of Huntington Park is a great case study for anyone wishing to understand Ms. Marin's candidacy.

I live a long and tedious 20 minutes drive from Huntington Park. The place makes me want to cry.

69 posted on 01/09/2004 9:58:33 AM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Ventura is on the Central coast. You mentioned Ventura and Bakersfield, I indicated (correctly) where they are. You did NOT mention the Bay area in that rant, and now you claim that I incorrectly located it in Central California.

If you're going to change the terms of debate every post, then the following message is just for you:


70 posted on 01/09/2004 10:11:46 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; Poohbah
"...please post your new map on your profile page so the rest of us can understand what you are talking about."

Thanks for the ping and the first rate amazement and amuzement!!!

Believe me... It's very amuzing!!! (you spell it your way, I'll spell it mine!)

71 posted on 01/09/2004 4:33:23 PM PST by SierraWasp (GovernMental EnvironMentalism has become totally counterproductive and everybody knows it !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
>> REMEMBER: BILL JONES OPPOSED THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S DECISION TO SUPPORT THE RECALL OF GRAY DAVIS <<

Good. He would have saved Kalifornistan millions of dollars that were WASTED electing an idealogical twin of Doofus who had an "R" next to his name. The "results" of the "recall" are clear, from the defeat of Prop. 54 to higher taxes for state parks.

Of course, it shouldn't even be possible for Jones to hold statewide office in the first place (even though he did it twice), according to the Doofus clone supporters. After all Jones has one of those "extremist" openly pro-life platforms, instead of running as an abortion-luvin' "fiscal conservative"

72 posted on 01/30/2004 10:34:41 PM PST by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson