Isn't the moon airless? Solar wind would be radiation and particles (plus of course astoroids and maybe small comets), but the point is that all this should have accummulated over Millions (no is it supposed to be Billions?) of years. That's why the legs of the LEM were designed so long, because the scientist believed strongly in evolution timeframes.
The other thing that mitigates against evolution is molecular biological machines like the flaggella (the whip like hair that propels some bacterium). The hair spins completely around propelling the creature. The thing is that there is an exact sequence of adding the right things at the right time else you can't get the effect. The odds of this happening by chance are beyond astronomical.
And I won't use the argument of the complexity of animal reproduction (behaviors, chemistry, sequencing), evolution can't touch it.
The fact is that nature is complex and the more you look at it the more complexity you discover. Evolution says the opposite but as the years go by more complexity than thought possible is the norm.
Thus the only logical conclusion is intellegent design. And that these designs are more complex than anything we could have imagined. To say that evolution produced what we see is, to say that monkeys created Shakespere's Othello from Trees and dark clay banks over millions of years.